|
.jpg)
Recent Similar Articles |
BOSTON HOUSING AUTHORITY (BHA): CRIME RESEARCH & INVESTIGATION PATTERN UNDER MILITARY BARRACK HOUSING SCHEME - SEE DORCHESTER, M
BOSTON HOUSING AUTHORITY (BHA): CRIME RESEARCH & INVESTIGATION PATTERN UNDER MILITARY BARRACK HOUSING SCHEME - SEE DORCHESTER, MATTAPAN, JAMAICA PALIN, ETC. In doing this case in the United States of America, the Publishers found the following: Reason for Review: 1. The United States District Court to reverse the decision of the BHA because it has no right under the evidence act and other laws of the United States for the BHA to receive full and several excellent housing and tenancy references and recommendations on Black Applicant and proceeds to issue subpoena on foreign landlords. 2. And/or thereafter under racist madness, BHA spent tax money to travel to oversea (Canada, Togo and Nigeria) to seek the opinions of the landlords in these countries where the Black applicant suffered torture and persecution (see US Immigration Decisions - 09/29/2005 & 10/07/2005 and United Nations Human Rights Special Rapporteur Reports 1999 - 2003). BHA has no right to overrule the decisions and reports of The Federal Government of America and United Nations. Latter-time Discovery: 1. BHA and some other housing authorities in Massachusetts have designed military barrack city type housing program by racist human exodus scheme which has led to inner city criminal drone with same racial group destroyed by racist authorities. 2. Multiculturalism is suppressed and intercepted by housing program to give racist government power to divide and rule the designated racial and poor groups. As the BHA pushes them to specific area or city the host authorities find easy to rule plan to use services to create imbalance and class system which are govern by repression. 3. As BHA continue to load and overload the cities with the same type of people and adapt racist policies and practices, under struggle to survive in hardway, commission of crime becomes part of way of life and survival. 4. If families of the same racial origin are put by secret housing project, the government must empower them and not to adapt easy to rule or conquer by divide and rule. If majority is educated, employed and has stable life, the bad ones will be reformed or relocate. et. etc. etc. Ofume Family v. Boston Housing Authority OFUME FAMILY (Phillip Ofume, et al) Appellant/Plaintiff Date of Decision: October 10, 2007 Date of Absentia Reconsideration Hearing: ? Date Decision was Postmarked: October 12, 2007 Date of Receipt of decision: October 16, 2007 1 Extrajudicial rationale and politicized reason for denial a. The BHA declared the Appellant (Ofume family) Ineligible for Public Housing in the United States because of the negative and persecutory letter issued by the country (Canada) where the Appellant suffered political and other forms of persecution and torture. The Appellant feels terrible and devastating discrimination in public housing in the State of Massachusetts. b. Reason that US Constitutional Judiciary is an umbrella of global constitutional judiciary and well made legal system, less than 000.1% of US Judicial system and Judges will allow foreign citation and references and worst in this matter, the Appellee or BHA did not apply for permission to use these sanctioned foreign citation and references. c. On September 29, 2005 via Halifax, International Airport, Nova Scotia Canada the Appellant fled the Canadian poisonous gas chambers, persecution and torture in Canada. 1 On September 29, 2005, October 5, 2005 and October 6, 2005, the approved representatives of the Government of America (US Immigration Officials and Asylum Officer - New Jersey) interviewed and heard the Appellant at Boston Logan Airport and Immigration Court, JFK Federal Building, Boston MA reviewed and condemned the cruelties of the Canadian/Nigerian governments and their agencies. Thereafter, on October 7, 2005 the Appellant was granted CREDIBLE FEAR OF TORTURE OR PERSECUTION (see the 24-page decision worksheet of the Asylum Officer) and officially admitted the Appellant in the United States by issuing the Appellant different US base official documents on September 29, 2005 through October 12, 2005. All these US base official documents and materials were severally submitted and resubmitted to the BHA. d. For over seven(7) years in Canada the Appellant was subjected to inside and outside community severe and vicious forms of harassment, discrimination, sanctions, embargoes, denial of services and related intolerance. The devout spirit of Christianity (Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints et al) helped the Appellant to contain these cruelties by proceeding to the Canadian kangaroo law courts and other judicial system such as the Boards, Commissions, Tribunal, Provincial Supreme Court (Nova Scotia), Court of Appeals, Federal Courts, Small Claim Courts, Supreme Court of Canada, etc. After exhausting this domestic mechanism, the Appellant and its NGOs proceeding to the United Nations. See Ref. E/CN.4/2001/21 http://www.unhchr.ch/->documents->charter- based bodies->commission on human rights-> UNITED NATIONS Economic and Social Council Fifty-seventh session Item 6 of the provisional agenda; http://www.angelfire.com/az3/ofume120/Antislavery Kongo.html; http://lawsuitprimeminister.cjb.net/; http://canadiangenocidenativeweb.org e. The reason behind these chain of persecutions and cruelties is the mass people’s mandate to the lead Appellant to become the President of Nigeria. see http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Dr.+Phillip+Ofume+ Political+Manifesto 2. Review requested on Appellant’s Conduct and mitigating circumstances in the United States of America a. September 29, 2005 - present, the Canadian /Nigeria governments and Nigeria’s domestic and foreign oil/gas and their allies crossed over into US and several an un-American sanctions were imposed and implemented by the government of Governor Mitt Romney (Canadian/US Citizen). Under this zero -income with large family of nine (9) the Appellant did not fight or engage in civil disobediences, the Appellant proceeded same way as it did in Canada and Nigeria via the domestic legal mechanism to defend the punitive denial of services which manufactured multiple litigations following: i. Immigration Court, JFK Federal Building, Boston MA - Ofume family v. Government of 2 Ofume Family v. Boston Housing Authority America Lead file No. 97-446-370 . Three (3) Administrative Appeals to the Office of Administrative Appeal (OAA); now three (3) Complaints to the Executive Office for Immigration Review - Office of the Chief Immigration Judge, VA USA; Individual Hearing without specific charges and allegations and formal arraignment; etc. ii. Ofume family v. Department of Homeland Security et al - US District Court, Boston, MA Docket Number: 1:07-cv-10085-GAO Document 3-1 Filed 01/23/2007) including several pre-trial Motions/Applications. 10 Defendants. iii. DTA ( SUPERIOR COURT, LAWRENCE, MA - Ofumes v. DTA Civil Docket No. ESCV2006-00381) iv. Ofume family v. Boston Housing Authority - preparing for appeal soon as decision is rendered per hearing on June 26, 2007. v. Ofume family v. Keyspan Inc. and District Sheriff - SUPERIOR COURT SALEM, MA CIVIL ACTION NO. 2007 - 1198-D vi. DTA ( SUPERIOR COURT, LAWRENCE, MA - Ofumes v. DTA Civil Docket No. ESCV2006-00381) - 2007 Civil Appeal vii. Ofume family v. Department of Social Services - SUPERIOR COURT SALEM, MA CIVIL DOCKET # ESCV2007-0107-A viii. Ofume family v. Registry of Motor Vehicles - Division of Insurance - Appeal ix. Ofume family v. Comcast Inc. - SUPERIOR COURT SALEM, MA CIVIL DOCKET # ESCV2007-0107-A x. Ofume family v. DTA APPEAL NO. 315921 xi. Ofume family v. Social Security Administration xii. Ofume family v. Department of Homeland Security et al - US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, Boston, MA Docket Number: 1:07-cv-10085-13 Defendants. xiii. Ofume family v. Department of Homeland Security (VERMONT SERVICE CENTER) - Application for Job Authorization, Adjustment of Status, etc before the Commissioner (DHS). xiv. Northeast Housing Court (Lawrence) - Ofume family v. Nancy & Salvatore Vigorito et al 07-CV-00178 Etc. b. Notwithstanding these imported cruelties against the Appellant including the pressures of Ofume Family v. Boston Housing Authority managing a large family of nine (9) persons without income to the extent that only the new born in US is given $239.00/month and affective April 2006 the under-14 children are given minimum food ration or stamps and without job authorization and with strings of academic and professional qualifications and experiences - see a summarized resume of the lead Appellant/parent (Dr. Phillip C. Ofume) http://groups-beta.google.com/ group/soc.org.nonprofit/topics?start= 10&hl=en&sa=N c. Also notwithstanding these imported cruelties against the Appellant including the pressures of managing a large family of nine (9) persons without income and job authorization, the Appellant is able to form domestic and international assembly and collaboration of experts and professionals to advise leaders, governments, politicians, lawmakers, etc. See EXTRACT: LEAD FILE: 97-446-370 (Immigration Court, Boston MA) “What we told Mr. President, UN and Government of America summarized as follows: Non of our advice and proposals to Mr. President, Government of America and their allies have failed. We have advised Mr. President and his allies not to use military or combative action to resolve the conflict in Yugoslavia, Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, North Korea, Palestine, etc. We have advised Mr. President and his allies that to conduct alternative justice sessions to bring disputants to peace table will cost less than $120,000.00 and that this money be paid to US Institute of Peace. We have advised Mr. President on the nearness or close range of the disputants and that military action would "scare" the disputants and push them further and further far from peace table and peacemaking. We have advised Mr. President that any military action will be badly regretted. Inside and outside Palestine/Israel conflicts, we have told Mr. President that Peace or Political Solution has less than 00.001% costs. We have advised Mr. President to develop and learn how to talk to everybody or how to build network and association without borders. We have clearly defined state and non-state terrorists/terrorisms. We have advised Mr. President and his allies that the people they called terrorists are not terrorists. We have advised Mr. President that these people are in search of social, economic, political, cultural, nationality and religion self-determination/rule/control. We companies, politicians, lawmakers and their allies are responsible for this poverty. In apportioning this blame, we advised Mr. President that foreign oil companies, politicians and lawmakers and their allies are responsible for the major part of the looting or capital flight across the majority of the oil producing countries because they create loot banks oversea which enable domestic oil companies, politicians, lawmakers and their allies to loot the remaining wealth of the oil producing nations. We have advised Mr. President that international human exodus from oil and non-oil producing countries is neo-slavery and that Americans oversea are given jobs and treated humanely and that Mr. President is expected to show good example in international relation and diplomacy by treating the foreign displaced experts, professionals, investors and others across US humanely. We have advised Mr. President that the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq which were misconceived as post-September 11, 2001 has been hijacked by international racist. We have advised Mr. President and his allies to return to our 2000/2001 advices or theory of how to talk or associate with everybody without distinction of race, colour, religion, gender and nationality to build peace network and path without border. Talk with everybody and building peace network without border are how to realize peace and democracy in Palestine, Afghanistan, Iraq, etc. We have advised Mr. President, UN and their allies and parties that the politics of nuclearization and denuclearization is discriminatory, terrible and mark of international systemic injustice. We have advised Mr. President and his allies to stay the action to hang President Saddam Hussein and others and that these people maybe key thoroughfares to peace and realization of peace and democracy in Iraq (and). We have advised Mr. President, UN and their allies and parties that Hamas was elected democratically and must be recognized. We have advised the UN and state parties to file emergency resolution unconditionally to recognize and form the sovereign State of Palestine. We have advised Mr. President, UN and its state parties and others that we have found the CURE MEDICATION for AIDS/HIV in America and Mexico and the cure medication be purchased immediately to save lives inside and outside Africa. We have informed Mr. President, UN and its state parties and others that AIDS and HIV are directly and indirectly BIO-POISON and MANMADE. We advised Mr. President and Government of America that Dr. Phillip Ofume who won the first highly contested chairmanship election in the Niger Delta Region of Nigeria to be the first chairman of the National Conscience Party (NCP) in Delta State is the best Presidential Candidate for Nigeria's Federal Election 2007. We have requested Mr. President and Government of America to name ONE citizen of America or immigrant in America that have spent time and money to give Mr. Presidents of America and governments of America this beautiful life and cost saving advices. etc. etc. etc.” d. At the highest level of community base harassment, rejection and exclusions, the Appellant has lived in US for over two years to the extent of the end of over two years parole by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) no forms of crime, hostility, fighting, community base quarrel and related brawl were traceable to the Appellant. Ofume Family v. Boston Housing Authority e. Notwithstanding the internal harassment groups funded by the Canadian/ Nigerian governments et al, in addition to granting the Appellant CREDIBLE FEAR OF TORTURE OR PERSECUTION, US Government officials and US landlords or property owners and neighbors where the Appellant has lived and associated with have issued several impressive references and recommendations on the Appellant. The BHA failed to respect the decision and references by US Government and US landlords or property owners and neighbors. See SUB-SCHEDULE B (6) for part of the impressive references and recommendations and other evidence/exhibits which the BHA received during application for public housing and appeal proceedings. f. The apprehension and shame of the emerging question on why a housing authority (BHA) should disrespect and ignore the decision, recommendations and references of the US Government and US landlords or property owners and neighbors in America and spend tax money to travel faraway oversea in country where the Appellant fear torture, death and persecution to get property owner’s recommendations and references before public housing is granted the Appellant in US. In page 2 of the decision appealed the BHA confirmed that all the landlords and property managers in US issued impressive recommendations and references on the Appellant. g. Disgracefully, the BHA failed to mention the CITY, PROVINCE/STATE and COUNTRY where such negative recommendations and references were issued. In paragraph 5 page 1 of the decision appealed, the fear which has traumatized the BHA on disclosure of the foreign landlord or the persecutor of the Appellant has forced the BHA to write ONLY, “CRESTVIEW GARDENS CITY CENTER PROPERTY MANAGEMENT” without the CITY, PROVINCE/STATE and COUNTRY. This tactic is used to deceive onlookers that this fictitious landlord is a resident of US and that the negative information was issued by US Landlord or property owner. h. The Appellant lived in Canada for about seven (7) years. Five(5) years of the seven (7) years in Canada, the Appellant was Landlord and bona fide owner of the home and property which lies situate at 8 Edwin Ford Court, Bedford, Nova Scotia Canada B4A 4B6. 8 Edwin Ford Court, Bedford, Nova Scotia Canada B4A 4B6 was purchased with Appellant’s money earned oversea. The properties were seized along with over $11million on December 17, 2003 after the Appellant were repatriated by the Canadian/Nigerian government from the Canadian/US borders (Calais, Maine US) on August 8, 2003 following the escape on August 6, 2003 to the United States. Appellant’s properties were seized to move the family to one of the Canadian poisonous gas chambers (11 Amin Street, Bedford, NS Canada B4A 4E3). The Appellant was forced to live in this gas chamber for about one year and nine months (1. 9 year). i. Prior to fleeing to US on September 29, 2005, 11 Amin Street, Bedford, NS Canada fume Family v. Boston Housing Authority B4A 4E3 is the only place the Appellant lived and the property is secretly controlled by the Canadian government and its agencies. All the two-page decision of the BHA did not mention 11 Amin Street, Bedford, NS Canada B4A 4E3 and its landlord or Canadian government and its agencies that are represented by the Nova Scotia Department of Community Services, 70 Memory Lane, Lower Sackville, Nova Scotia Canada. j. During the second escape to US on September 29, 2005, the Appellant took extensive photographs of its home (internal and external structures), vehicles, land and other properties and good valued over $4million in addition to over $11million seized by the Canadian government on December 17, 2003. Everything was intact at 11 Amin Street, Bedford, NS Canada B4A 4E3 and no one knows who acquired the second part of the Appellant’s abandoned properties which are valued over $4million including vehicles. k. In paragraph 5 page 1 of the decision appealed (notification of landlord by tenant prior to proceeding to further exile in US), unintelligibly the BHA argued outside the wisdom of the theory of all time refugees’ conditions including escape to safe country and place from hostile and uncivilized country like Canada. Under the conditions of refugees and stateless persons, victim of state created danger, persecution and torture can not inform their persecutors that they desire to escape the ring of persecution and torture. See UN Convention of July 28, 1951 (preamble through articles 20). In both ancient and modern times, escape into exile or safe place is done without prior notice. Reason that escape on August 6, 2003 and the landing on August 8, 2003 was disadvantaged by internal disclosure, thereafter escape on September 29, 2005 was broadcasted externally or outside Canada against escape rules and regulations. I. Ground of the animosity and fear of the Canadian/Nigerian governments and their agencies - The lead Appellant, Dr. Phillip Chukwuma Ofume is Presidential Candidate In-Exile of the NIGER DELTA REGION OF NIGERIA campaigning for the President of Nigeria 2007 and now re-launched for 2011. In Nigeria, Canada and some of her allies believe in killing and dehumanizing opposition members to control energy, mines, communications and part of the oil/gas sector. See the cases of Chief (Alhaja) Kudirat Abiola; Chief (Alhaji) MKO Abiola; Dr. Phillip C. Ofume; etc. 2. Jurisdiction review is sought a. Notwithstanding that the Appellant is Black, Refugees, Stateless persons, Homeless persons, Zero-income persons, New Immigrant and Fire incident persons and that the international and domestic laws which recognized these statuses grant the Appellant immunity from being interrogated under extensive documentation, evidence and exhibits by rely on the allegations of its persecutor and compelling it to show broad base documents and other material evidence/exhibits as the aliens that are not fleeing persecution but the Appellant went beyond normal capacity to submit and resubmit all the documentary and material evidence/exhibits demanded by the rules set by the BHA and Massachusetts regarding right to public housing. See SCHEDULE B (6) of Appellant’s Notice of Appeal. The documents and other material evidence/exhibits which the Appellant submitted and resubmitted are on BHA’s file and should they claim the contrary, the Appellant will be ready to resubmit the documents and other material evidence/exhibits to this honourable Court. b. The United States Housing Act of 1937 (Housing Act) per enforceable rights, privileges, or immunities within the meaning of 42 U.S.C. § 1983. c. United States Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title II 42 U.S.C. sec. 2000a(a). d. The Constitution of the United States of America - 42 U.S.C. sec. 1983 or Bivens action. e. Eight Amendment to the United States Constitution. f. United Nations Convention Relating to the Status of refugees (“CRSR” ) and Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (“CAT”) - re. respective implementing statutes. g. Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution h. Other Constitutional Arguments (Right to Intimate Association) - US Supreme Court in Roberts v. United States Jaycees i. Chapter 111, of the General Laws, State Sanitary Code; Chapter 11: MinimumStandards of Fitness for Human Habitation, 105 CMR 410.000; MGL 111 s. 127 - 0; etc. 1. Appellant, OFUME FAMILY (Phillip Ofume, et al) intend to proceed FORMA PAUPERIS and PRO SE with Jury. Motion to proceed FORMA PAUPERIS was previously and recently granted Appellant in The Salem Superior Court, Salem MA, The United States District Court, Boston MA and The Superior Court, Lawrence, MA within jurisdiction on April 24, 2007 and June 25, 2007. See Ofume family v. Dept. of Homeland Security et al - NO. 07-10085-GAO; ( SUPERIOR COURT, LAWRENCE, MA - Ofumes v. DTA Civil Docket No. ESCV2006-00381) - 2007 Civil Appeal; Ofume family v. Keyspan Inc. and District Sheriff - SUPERIOR COURT SALEM, MA CIVIL ACTION NO. 2007 - 1198-D; etc. j. Predetermined, premeditated and intentional denial with bad cause. 3. Review of the evidence/exhibits received by the Appellee (BHA) in To facilitate the review sought, the Appellant hereto attached the following evidence and exhibits all of which was received by the BHA: a. Decision appealed dated October 10, 2007. b. Appellant’s Notice of Appeal (14 pages excluding documentary and material exhibits) dated May 5, 2007 and mailed by US Certified Mail. See SUB-SCHEDULE B (6) for part of the evidence/exhibits which the BHA received during application for public housing or appeal proceedings. Appellant’s Notice of Appeal is hereto attached for the perusal of the interceding court. c. On several occasions the BHA received evidence/exhibits and denied receipts, the evidence and exhibits listed in SUB-SCHEDULE B (6) were submitted and re-submitted several times and each time the BHA denies receipt and the entire package would be re-submitted. 4. Fact which demands direct judicial review and discovery examination a. The Immigration and other statuses of the Applicant (Dr. Phillip C. Ofume, Mrs. Maureen Ngozi Ofume and their seven children) are Refugees, Stateless persons, Homeless persons, Zero-income persons, New Immigrant and Fire incident persons. b. In Court of judicial and fact review in US, the intervening staff of the BHA that made roadside appearance thus, requested for “close examination and review” of the past factual case files of the Asians, Arabs, Blacks, Hispanics, Indians, Whites, etc. to know whether the same applicants that are Refugees, Stateless persons, Homeless persons, Zero-income persons, New Immigrant and Fire incident persons were able to submit the extensive evidence/exhibits which the Appellant (Ofume family) has submitted and be denied. c. The protests of the Appellant and these intervenors extend to question at issue, whether these applicants particularly the white applicants and moderate or preferred applicants that suffered political persecution and torture oversea were requested to go back to the countries where they suffered torture and persecution to reference and certification letters from their landlord and their landlords or property owners. d. The Appellant and his family (seven children and two parents) in accordance with the United Nations Conventions of July 28, 1951; September 28, 1954; November 20, 1989; etc are Political and Convention Refugees, Stateless Persons and Prisoners of Conscience adopted by the United Nations High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR) and Amnesty International; lawfully admitted in the United States of America. e. The Appellant (Ofume family) is devout Christian and members of Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints. Members of this Christian church do not fight, drink alcohol, smoke, drink coffee, never engage in any confrontation with neighbors and others. Worldwide members of this church make the best tenants and neighbors. e. Decisions of the US Asylum Officer and US Immigration Officials received by the BHA: i. at Logan Airport on September 29, 2005 Appellant and his family were interviewed for over 12 hours by the US Immigration Officials and thereafter they were granted asylum; ii. on October 5 and 6, 2005 Appellant and his family were subjected to further lengthy interview by the US Asylum Officer (New Jersey USA); iii. on October 7, 2005 the US Asylum Officer (New Jersey) found that the Appellant and his family have demonstrated a CREDIBLE FEAR OF PERSECUTION OR TORTURE and we were granted asylum or lawfully admitted in the United States of American and released us on October 7, 2005 (Please see a 25-page worksheet of the US Asylum Officer (New Jersey); iv. on October 12, 2005 the Appellant and his family were issued 1-94 cards by US Immigrations Officials. 5. Per the paid condemnation by the BHA in paragraphs 1 - 4 page 1 of the decision appealed, Appellant demands direct review on Appellant’s endurance, Christianity, patience and peace making efforts inside and outside the United States of America (supplemental to para 1 a. The size of the Appellant’s family is 9. For over two years in US the cross over of the Canadian/Nigerian governments and Nigeria’s domestic and foreign oil/gas companies and their allies has created unbearable pains and hardship for the Appellant. The assignment was issued to the government of Mitt Romney (Canadian/US citizen). b. September 29, 2005 - April 3, 2006 zero-income including zero food stamp. Entire family forced to beg food, school supplies, bus fare, sanitary product, etc from street to street. On March 3, 2006 proceeded to the Superior Court Salem/Lawrence. On April 6, 2006 minimum under 14-children food ration or stamp issued to the Appellant. The family continued to beg food (part), school supplies, bus fare, sanitary product, etc. On November 25, 2006 the family had new born baby and only $239.00/mo is given to this baby. All the six children get no cash assistance. Several people and families faced with these over nine years cruelties would fight, commit suicide, etc. 10 c. October 12, 2005 - present, Canadian/Nigerian governments and Nigeria’s domestic and foreign oil/gas companies created harassment tugs inside and outside the Appellant’s apartment for 24hours/day to bang, hit, smoke, drink, etc with the intention to cause domestic brawl. d. Under the forgoing hardship the infiltrators entered different branches of government and its agencies to block all applications for services to created serial litigations short listed in subparagraph 2 (a) above. The Appellant did not fight, engage in any anti-government/America and Americans activities and related breach of peace activity. Relief a. Decision appealed (attached) be dismissed with letter of apology which will be published internationally. b. Special Damage and General damage of $5million or within the jurisdiction of the Court against the Appellee or Boston Housing Authority (BHA) for public housing discrimination and what the Appellant suffered in living in secret torture detention and prison for longtime. See 33 Arlington Street, apartment #1 Lynn MA 01902 and Northeast Housing Court (Lawrence) - Ofume family v. Nancy & Salvatore Vigorito et al 07-CV-00178 c. A declaration that the action of the BHA violates every facets of the US and global anti-discriminatory laws and constitutional human rights legislation particularly the fundamental human rights of the Appellant as to access to right to PUBLIC HOUSING in Massachusetts. d. Appellant intend to proceed FORMA PAUPERIS and PRO SE, e. Request Jury Hearing and direct discovery examination on documentary and other material evidence/exhibits mentioned above and in possession of the BHA and which the Appellant will consent to resubmit to the Jury. e. Restraining and injunctive Order and other Order upon the BHA against all forms of harassment on before and during and after this matter. f. Further declaration that the action of the BHA fails to consider the needs and barriers of Refugees, Stateless persons, Homeless persons, Zero-income persons, New Immigrant and Fire incident persons. k. The Plaintiff demands further judgment against the Appellee or BHA for damages and such other relief as this court deems just. RE-ISSUED at Lynn, Massachusetts, this 30th day of May, 2008 Ofume Family v. Boston Housing Authority For: Dr. Phillip C. Ofume, and Mrs. Maureen N. Ofume TO: Sarah Allison Thornton - Clerk of Court CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Dr. Phillip C. Ofume, Representative/Advocate for the Appellant hereby certify that I have this 30th day of May, 2008 served the foregoing document, upon all parties, by mailing a copy, first class, postage prepaid to: Tifanie Ellis-Niles - Hearing Officer _____________________ DATED: May 30, 2008 Copies to:
|
|
© 1999–2008 Philadelphia Independent Media Center |
|
Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by PhillyIMC.
|
Comentarios
Enviar un comentario nuevo