home

Why we are fighting in Gaza

by

The constant malicious spread of disinformation about Israel's Gaza operation must be countered by a simple statement of the facts. This is what I tell people who ask. I hope you find it useful. If you do use it, or parts of it, please credit the source.

Why we are fighting in gaza  
14 Jan 2009
 
Demand an immediate cease fire - Only Hamas can stop the fire, because Hamas started it. The current operation in Gaza began because Hamas declared they would not continue the cease fire, and Hamas fired rockets on Israel.. If Israel ceases fire, Hamas will not stop firing: Hamas continues to fire rockets during the humanitarian truce that IDF observes each afternoon between 13:00 and 16:00 hours.

Demand an end to war crimes and prosecute war criminals - Hamas cannot claim the privileges and immunities of statehood and yet commit war crimes with impunity Hamas has fired over 10,000 rockets and projectiles at Israeli towns with no provocation. They have terrorized nearly a million Israeli citizens, causing dozens of casualties during the reign of terror, killing women and children for no reason. Indiscriminate targeting of civilians is a war crime. Hamas are proud that they use their own civilians as human shields. Use of human shields is a war crime. Hamas have kidnapped an Israeli soldier, Gilad Shalit and hold him without granting the humanitarian privileges guaranteed by international conventions. That is a war crime. Hamas dress up their soldiers as hospital personnel and as Israeli soldiers, both forbidden by international conventions.

End the humanitarian crisis in Gaza - Hamas closed the Rafah crossing and dismissed the international monitors, making it impossible to bring aid into Gaza via Rafah. Hamas confiscated Israeli humanitarian shipments for their own purposes. Cement was taken to build underground bunkers and tunnels. Hamas steal the humanitarian aid that Israel sends for Gaza civilians. They use it for their own purposes or sell it to the Gazans.

Support peace and a two state solution - Hamas declare that Jihad is the only way, and that international conferences, proposals and negotiations are a waste of time. Hamas has repeatedly declared that it would never make peace with Israel. Pro-Hamas is anti-Peace.

Fight Racism and warmongering - Anti-Israel and anti-Semitic organizations have organized mass "peace" protests against Israel during the Gaza operation. The so-called progressive peace protesters carry posters with these messages "Nuke Israel" "I hate Juice" "We are all Hamas." Protesters shout chants such as "Hamas Hamas, Jews to the gas." Do not dignify these vicious racist mobs as peace protesters with a legitimate grievance.

General- Every Israeli regrets the loss of innocent life in Gaza, and the urgent necessity that forced us to take this step after rockets rained on Sderot and other towns for years.

Israel evacuated Gaza in 2005. There is no occupation in Gaza and Hamas is not fighting any Gaza occupation. Hamas took over Gaza by force in 2007, killing Fatah operatives and instituting an internal reign of terror. They chased the international monitors away from the Rafah crossing, forcing its closing. They fired on the Israeli controlled crossings as well as firing on Israeli towns, forcing periodic closing of the crossings for repair. Then, like the man who killed his parents and demanded mercy because he is an orphan, they proclaimed that Gaza is under siege. They kidnapped a soldier and asked for release of hundreds of terrorists as ransom.

During all this time, the international community said and did nothing. The UN, the United States, the EU did nothing to stop the rain of rocket fire in Israeli cities. In June of 2008, a truce was agreed between Hamas and Israel. Israel agreed to the truce to save lives and to stop the rain of rockets, knowing that Hamas would use the truce to expand its military capabilities. Israel refrained from responding to repeated violations of this truce.

In November of 2008 IDF discovered a tunnel that Hamas was digging into Israel, and destroyed it on November 4. This was an excuse for Hamas to step up rocket fire into Israel. On December 18, Hamas declared that it would not renew the truce unless Israel agreed to allow free flow of goods - including explosives and armaments - into Gaza. On December 24, Hamas rained about 60 projectiles on Israel. As was expected, the previous "lull," which did not include provisions for stopping the smuggling of arms, allowed Hamas to increase its military capability significantly. The small, home made Qassam rockets that fell on Sderot were replaced by Grad (Katyusha) rockets, regulation military ordinance used in war. These have a range of up to 45 KM and were used to bomb Beersheba, Ashdod and Yavne. (see Map of Hamas Rocket Range). Another truce with no provisions against smuggling will only serve to enhance Hamas capabilities.

No country subjected to a barrage of rockets such as Israel has suffered since 2005 would have acted with less force and resolve.

The high number of civilian casualties in Gaza is regrettable. It is due to Hamas operating deliberately from built up areas, using hospitals and mosques as headquarters and arms stores, forcing people to act as human shields. The low number of Israeli casualties is not due to Hamas humanitarianism. Hamas launched over 500 projectiles at Israel. Every one was potentially lethal. They destroyed automobiles and wrecked houses and classrooms. Many deaths were averted only because residents managed to find shelter. It is not the fault of Israel that we provide shelters and a warning system for our civilians and try to keep them away from military operations. Hamas can do the same.

* http://www.zionism-israel.com/log/archives/00000654.html

Comments

Gaza/Hamas' side of it

http://bostonuniversity.blogspot.com/2009/01/end-game-in-gaza-war-part-iii.html

"For the fighting to end on Israel’s terms, Hamas must accept blame for provoking the Israeli assault without winning any acknowledgement of the humanitarian crisis that has been unfolding in Gaza ever since Hamas won the U.S. promoted elections in January 2006. For almost two years, a concerted effort to isolate and overthrow Hamas and to undermine the Gaza economy has been encouraged by the U.S. government and the European Union and implemented by Israel and the PA. Hamas leaders were told they could lift the siege only by abstaining from anti-Israeli violence, acknowledging the legitimate existence of Israel, and accepting the agreements signed between Israel and the PA."

what a repulsive article...

...but at least it shows the horrific (false) logic of supporters of this mass-murder... For more insight into these folks, check out this new video at alternet:

http://www.alternet.org/audits/119372

GREAT article

The silly video Hans submitted doesn't represent much, other than the emotions of people who are being hassled by a sarcastic reporter. Clearly calling for people to be wiped out is an overstatement.

Reality is subjective, but the more I learn the more I understand Israeli position.

No matter what video I post here some will call it propoganda.
For those of you whose hearts and minds are still open you will be moved by the ritual abuse of children by Hammas, in clear violation of all human ethics:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eTGbP55HGi8

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EeZzSgKUde8

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J08GqXMr3YE

Not entirely sure "abuse" is the right word

The first video shows children being indoctrinated, being taught how to perform combat maneuvers and that the Jews of Israel are their enemies.
The term "abuse of children" calls up an entirely different mental image.
I'm not going to try and suggest that Hamas is made up of a bunch of sweet, cheerful fellows who are completely innocent of acts of violence against Israel.

Pretty Good Article

This was a pretty good article explaining the Israeli perspective. I would like to see more articles like this on PhillyIMC.

Merely calling it "repulsive" is unhelpful. A helpful criticism would explain either the flaws in the logic or why the article otherwise failed to convince.

The EU Applied Research Insitute has another

view on the Israeli withdrawal from Gaza in 2005.

http://www.poica.org/editor/case_studies/view.php?recordID=1132

Especially under consideration was the question of whether Gaza had been turned into an "open air prison" or not.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options