Recent Similar ArticlesGaza: Israel:
|
Protest against the January 2009 attack on Gaza
by
Rich Gardner | 01.03.2009
Photoessay of protest rally/march in Philadelphia that ended hours before the Israelis launched a ground invasion of Gaza.
Well, the Israeli attack on Gaza began a few hours after our march concluded, so this was a last oppotunity to express our disapproval before the ground invasion began.
Opinions about the Israeli-Palestinian dispute are so entrenched that any single outbreak of violence is automatically evaluated through a pre-existing lens, shaped by one's typically immovable beliefs about which side bears most of the blame for the conflict generally or "who started it." Still, any minimally decent human being -- even those who view the world through the most blindingly pro-Israeli lens possible, the ones who justify anything and everything Israel does, and who discuss these events with a bottomless emphasis on the primitive (though dangerous) rockets lobbed by Hamas into Southern Israel but without even mentioning the ongoing four-decades brutal occupation or the recent, grotesquely inhumane blockade of Gaza -- would find the slaughter of scores of innocent Palestinians to be a horrible and deeply lamentable event.

Democratic voters overwhelmingly oppose the Israeli offensive -- by a 24-point margin (31-55%). By stark constrast, Republicans, as one would expect (in light of their history of supporting virtually any proposed attack on Arabs and Muslims), overwhelmingly support the Israeli bombing campaign (62-27%).

And a very welcome comment I found extemely hopeful [emphases added]
Donna Edwards, the newly elected, netroots-supported Democratic Congresswoman from Maryland, who removed the standard establishment Democratic incumbent Al Wynn from office this year, has the following to say about Israel/Gaza:
I am deeply disturbed by this week's escalation of hostilities in the Gaza Strip, as I have been by the ongoing rocket fire into southern Israel. To support Israel and to ease the humanitarian crisis facing the people of Gaza, the United States must work actively for an immediate ceasefire that ends the violence, stops the rockets, and removes the blockade of Gaza.
That's much further than most national Democrats have been willing to go. And it illustrates that primary challenges can -- slowly but meaningfully -- change the face of the Democratic Party.
Counterinsurgency, now popular again among in the Pentagon, is another way of saying the suppression of national liberation struggles. Terror and intimidation are as essential to it as is winning hearts and minds. ---------- ...there have been large demonstrations in Lebanon, Yemen, Jordan, Egypt, Syria and Iraq. The people of the Arab world will not forget. The Palestinians will not forget. "All that you have done to our people is registered in our notebooks," as the poet Mahmoud Darwish said.

[The Israelis] will want to completely dismantle all vestiges of Hamas power and, presumably, restore Fatah to power in the Strip. I can't imagine how this can be accomplished, although it might result, eventually, in an end to split government among the Palestinians. But 'eventually' can be a very long time and 'might' is a very loaded word. ------- Since I cannot envision a likely scenario in which this invasion will ultimately save more lives than it costs (on either side, or in total), I have no choice but to condemn it as a morally unacceptable decision.
Marching in solidarity. The group sponsoring this rally/march is the International Action Center. The new Philadelphia anti-war organization, Philly Against War, contributed some members to the march. The NW Greens were quite concerned about their Green Party 2008 Presidential candidate Cynthia McKinney, having her boat rammed while trying to land in Gaza.
Oh, and if you're wondering how the guy who's still the President is viewed by former friends and allies, Iyad Allawi, who "was hand-picked by Bush to head the interim Iraqi government in the summer of 2004," says:
“Yes, Bush’s policies failed utterly,” said Allawi, describing the U.S. administration that once backed him. “Utter failure. Failure of U.S. domestic and foreign policy, including fighting terrorism and economic policy. His insistence on names like ‘democracy’ and ‘open elections’, without giving attention to political stability, was a big mistake. It cast shadows on Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan and Egypt, and I believe this will be remembered in history as President Bush’s policy,” he said.
The march ended at Fox News, probably because that station is so closely aligned with the current administration.
And then called it a day. Wish I could say that we made a difference, even though it's well worth doing in any event.
|
Comments
No choices in Gaza
Submitted by Elihu (not verified) on Mon, 01/05/2009 - 10:12amA ground operation had to be launched. Hamas rockets were being fired on a regular basis at Israeli kindergartens and homes. The Hamas charter makes perfectly clear what that organization aims for: The utter destruction of Israel and the Jews who inhabit the Jewish state and the replacement of Israel with an Islamic caliphate.
The Hamas charter is clear about its methodology- Hamas' methodology not peaceful:
Article 7 of the Charter, entitled 'The Universality of Hamas' ends with these words:
"Hamas is one of the links in the Chain of Jihad in the confrontation with the Zionist invasion. It links up with the setting out of the Martyr Izz a-din al-Qassam and his brothers in the Muslim Brotherhood who fought the Holy War in 1936; it further relates to another link of the Palestinian Jihad and the Jihad and efforts of the Muslim Brothers during the 1948 War, and to the Jihad operations of the Muslim Brothers in 1968 and thereafter. But even if the links have become distant from each other, and even if the obstacles erected by those who revolve in the Zionist orbit, aiming at obstructing the road before the Jihad fighters, have rendered the pursuance of Jihad impossible; nevertheless, the Hamas has been looking forward to implement Allah’s promise whatever time it might take. The prophet, prayer and peace be upon him, said: The time will not come until Muslims will fight the Jews (and kill them); until the Jews hide behind rocks and trees, which will cry: O Muslim! there is a Jew hiding behind me, come on and kill him! This will not apply to the Gharqad, which is a Jewish tree (cited by Bukhari and Muslim)."
Note the clear reference to 1936 - A before the modern, sovereign state of Israel existed.
See also:
"Article Thirteen: Peaceful Solutions, [Peace] Initiatives and International Conferences
[Peace] initiatives, the so-called peaceful solutions, and the international conferences to resolve the Palestinian problem, are all contrary to the beliefs of the Islamic Resistance Movement. For renouncing any part of Palestine means renouncing part of the religion; the nationalism of the Islamic Resistance Movement is part of its faith, the movement educates its members to adhere to its principles and to raise the banner of Allah over their homeland as they fight their Jihad:"
As we are so often reminded, Hamas was chosen by Gazans in a democratic election -overwhelmingly- as the leadership of Gaza. There have been no protests in Gaza against Hamas' targeting of Israeli civilians. Recent polls (March 2008) have shown that the vast majority of Palestinians were in favor of 'operations' such as the murder of yeshiva students at Merkaz HaRav.
Hamas has never moderated its agenda. No amount of reasoning will change Hamas' strategy or its tactics.
For Hamas, the war against Jews - and not merely Israel, is a global one. Hamas' charter enshrines the most vicious lies of classic anti-Semitic literature such as the Protocols of the Elders of Zion: See Article 22, for instance: "The enemies have been scheming for a long time, and they have consolidated their schemes, in order to achieve what they have achieved. They took advantage of key elements in unfolding events, and accumulated a huge and influential material wealth which they put to the service of implementing their dream. This wealth [permitted them to] take over control of the world media such as news agencies, the press, publication houses, broadcasting and the like. [They also used this] wealth to stir revolutions in various parts of the globe in order to fulfill their interests and pick the fruits. They stood behind the French and the Communist Revolutions and behind most of the revolutions we hear about here and there. They also used the money to establish clandestine organizations which are spreading around the world, in order to destroy societies and carry out Zionist interests. Such organizations are: the Freemasons, Rotary Clubs, Lions Clubs, B’nai B’rith and the like. All of them are destructive spying organizations. They also used the money to take over control of the Imperialist states and made them colonize many countries in order to exploit the wealth of those countries and spread their corruption therein. As regards local and world wars, it has come to pass and no one objects, that they stood behind World War I, so as to wipe out the Islamic Caliphate. They collected material gains and took control of many sources of wealth. They obtained the Balfour Declaration and established the League of Nations in order to rule the world by means of that organization. They also stood behind World War II, where they collected immense benefits from trading with war materials and prepared for the establishment of their state. They inspired the establishment of the United Nations and the Security Council to replace the League of Nations, in order to rule the world by their intermediary. There was no war that broke out anywhere without their fingerprints on it: “…"
Those who would defend Hamas and its ideology under the banner of liberal values are naive at best and disingenuous at worst.
Hamas chose not to renew the cease-fire with Israel and to launch rockets solely at civilian targets. Hamas chose to use the cease-fire to arm itself in preparation for a war of annihilation against the Jewish state and any Jew, Christian, Hindu, Buddhist, Zoroastrian or Atheist who refuses to submit to Islam as Hamas interprets it. That is a shame, because Hamas left Israel with no choice but to defend her citizens, in full accordance with International law.
No nation besides Israel has been asked to suffer the threatening presence of such an enemy at its doorstep and refrain from defending her citizens when attacked. No nation aside from Israel has actually called the homes of enemy civilians to warn them before attacks during a counteroffensive, so that the civilians might find safe haven. No nation beside Israel has imported tons of humanitarian supplies in the midst of a war to a population that supports its mortal enemies. No other nation has opened its hospitals without any charge to that same population, in the midst of hostilities.
Pray for Israel's safety and a quick end to this offensive, with as few civilian deaths as possible and an overdue realization by Hamas that they will gain nothing by attacking Israel's citizens.
But what's the answer?
Submitted by Rich Gardner on Mon, 01/05/2009 - 2:42pmhttp://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20090104/hl_afp/mideastconflictgazaisraelrelief_090104201449
Sorry, but the statement "No nation beside Israel has imported tons of humanitarian supplies in the midst of a war to a population that supports its mortal enemies" is rebutted by the link above. Gaza is suffering a humanitarian crisis because such supplies are not being permitted through to those who need them.
Your whole piece suggests only one possible answer to the conflict, the complete and total annihilation of the population of Gaza. The counter-insurgency blog
http://abumuqawama.blogspot.com/
has made the point many times that the hard core guerrilla warriors of any insurgent group can be separated from their civilian supporters by the use of regular, normal politics, by attempting to redress the grievances of the civilians, by seeing to it that their legitimate needs are being met. I find it very difficult to believe that the entire million-plus population of Gaza subscribes to all of the theories that you present here.
I have no doubt that there are a great many members of Hamas who subscribe completely to all of the anti-Israel, ant-Jewish sentiments you cite, but while it is true that "Hamas chose not to renew the cease-fire with Israel and to launch rockets solely at civilian targets," it is also true that last January, Hamas "blasted through parts of the wall Wednesday [that separated Gaza from Egypt]. That allowed tens of thousands of Palestinians to flood into Egypt for supplies and medical attention unavailable inside Gaza because of Israel's clampdown on its borders."
http://www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/meast/01/28/gaza.border/index.html
This is not a conflict where one side is entirely in the right and one side entirely in the wrong. There must be some way to end the conflict other than by just killing.
Hypocrites On The March
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 01/07/2009 - 12:30pmWhen I see a "peace" demonostration where there's even one sign that tells Hamas to stop its' rocket attacks, then I won't call you hypocrites.
But the facts are the facts and what you do speaks louder than what you say.
But there are so many
Submitted by Rich Gardner on Wed, 01/07/2009 - 1:45pmpeople in the traditional, mass media telling Hamas that they must halt their rocket attacks, what's the point?
With limited space on our signs, why bother repeating what everybody else is saying?
Isn't it obvious that we'd like BOTH sides to stop the killing? Isn't it obvious that Israel is by far the stronger power and that they must take the initiative to work out a deal with Hamas so that Hamas no longer feels the need to send rockets into Israel?
I notice the Jewish Star at the top of the page...being equated
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 03/05/2009 - 11:00pmI notice the poster at the very top that equates the Jewish Star of David with the Swastika...
Way to go...
That shows the true colors of the protestors...black and brown...
Very disrespectful to a religious symbol...
If people think that the protestors are simply anti-Israel...just look at that poster...
Can I use pictures ?
Submitted by Yasser Ashraf Mohsen (not verified) on Tue, 06/08/2010 - 2:49pmWe were making a video about the Israeli attack on the Freedom Flotilla, and I was wondering if we can use photos from the photos u have.
Thanks,
Yasser Ashraf Mohsen
Post new comment