home

PA Got Peace Clout, If We Would Only Notice

by

PA Got Peace Power, If We Would Only Notice

People far away from Pennsylvania think that the Specter - Sestak primary race is important. But Philadelphians who are for peace, at times, dream of going to Ohio to work with Dennis Kucinich, or Western PA with John Murtha, and in the past went to join large Washington DC protests, where we tend to think important decisions on war and peace are made.

However, some highly seasoned activists in Washington DC, instead long to be in Pennsylvania where they hope a most critical decision on the war will be made.

Just Foreign Policy wants a just US foreign policy. They pat themselves over the head for their role in stopping Bush from attacking Iran. They are excited that Arlen Specter, for over a year, has been more and more critical of the Afghanistan War. Specter contends that the war is only backfiring and helping al Qaeda to recruit, and lately is even talking about opposing supplemental war funding. While he is already in a tight primary race with Joe Sestak who supports the Afghan War surge.

But Philadelphians yawn or say what weird thing is going to happen next. Specter had enough of the Republican Party when its new ultra-conservative leaders vowed to use national Republican money to defeat him in the Republican primary. Then Specter, when he became a Democrat, wouldn't join fellow Democrats in supporting the Union Free Choice Act, which was the first test of Obama's clout. So progressive Philadelphians decided that the new freedom Specter now had to support progressive causes meant nothing. However, Specter has been moving forthrightedly on the subject of human rights and civil liberties.

Specter's comments on Afghanistan agree with Obama's assumption that al Qaeda is extremely dangerous, and that we must do what we can to challenged al Qaeda, which might help Specter lobby Obama in the future, and, to me, it is also important that they tend to negate some of the backlash against Afghan war opponents for being weak on terror, in the event that al Qaeda launches another US terror attack. Also certain organizations that used to talk for peace (mainly Move On .org), are very careful not to criticize Obama too much. Since Specter usually has high praise for Obama, and his anti-Afghan War position doesn't challenge Obama's integrity, it is possible that this might be a peace issue Move On might add to its petition to Congress for a binding exit strategy. See their petition, http://pol.moveon.org/afghan_timeline/?rc=homepage

The following are some of Specter's comments:

"I oppose sending 30,000 additional American troops to Afghanistan because I am not persuaded that it is indispensable in our fight against Al Qaeda. If it was, I would support an increase because we have to do whatever it takes to defeat Al Qaeda since they're out to annihilate us. But if Al Qaeda can operate out of Yemen or Somalia, why fight in Afghanistan where no one has succeeded?

"I disagree with the President's two key assumptions: that we can transfer responsibility to Afghanistan after 18 months and that our NATO allies will make a significant contribution. It is unrealistic to expect the United States to be out in 18 months so there is really no exit strategy. This venture is not worth so many American lives or the billions it will add to our deficit."

<
Somehow Specter has the image of being wishy-washy. Some might even interpret the above statement that way, believing there is something wishy-washy about opposing both al Qaeda and the war. Right or wrong he firmly believed that Anita Hill was grossly exaggerating how future Supreme Court Judge Clarence Thomas treated her, and back before Anita Hill, the media once thought that personal gossip was none of the public's business. The only previous well-publicized exception was Adam Clayton Powell a decade earlier. Back when Specter was on the Warren Commission investigating the assassination of President Kennedy, the entire Warren Commission including Earl Warren himself, probably had a nagging fear that it was possible that somehow Kennedy's assassination involving racism and bigotry that extending very high up.

Why wasn't Earl Warren, who after all was a Supreme Court Judge, blamed for the failings of the Warren Commission? But they were numb to discover that the world they knew was different from the real world where the CIA was actually trying to assassinate Fidel Castro and do other bad things they thought only the bad guys did. And at the same time Cuban emigres in this country were screaming that Castro did it to get even, while the Cuban Air Force was on the highest alert, bracing for a US attack. Much of the US public was also numb to suddenly discover that the US wasn't always the good guys.

The entire Warren Commission and much of the American public felt President Johnson was making it all right again with his Civil Rights and Great Society programs, healing the sickness that might have had something to do with President Kennedy being shot. Earl Warren, Arlen Specter and indeed the entire Warren Commission had a burning desire to support civil liberties and human rights. Too bad they weren't better able to articulate why. Today since President Bush declassified the CIA'so called "Family of Jewels" on Oswald's extensive dealings with the CIA and FBI, no one believes Arlen Specter's theory that Lee Harvey Oswald assassinated President Kennedy without any help. The latest cover up is E. Howard Hunt's death bed accusations that Lyndon Johnson had Kennedy killed. Since that accusation came out, no new people have joined the crusade to uncover the truth. Senator Specter's book. Passion for Truth, on page 113, clearly states such things as that J. Edgar Hoover tried to hide Oswald's diary contacts with FBI agent James P. Hosty from the Warren Commission. And other fascinating details on the everyday activities of the Warren Commission are in that book. Specter's potential for coming up with new insights and especially for the American people to pay attention is much greater if he stays in office rather than getting defeated.

Just Foreign Policy also noted, something in Obama's Afghan surge speech that both hawks and doves tend to miss. Obama's statement as to what US goals were in Afghanistan were extremely limited. Something about preventing the Taliban from defeating the government. Just Foreign Policy and Shibil Siddiq at Foreign Policy in Focus, noticed that there are behind the scenes negations between the US and the Taliban toward a cease fire,
http://www.justforeignpolicy.org/node/429
http://www.justforeignpolicy.org/node/428
http://www.justforeignpolicy.org/node/427
http://www.fpif.org/fpiftxt/6626
http://www.ufppc.org/us-a-world-news-mainmenu-35/9167-background-us-involved-in-talks-with-afghan-taliban.html
http://seminal.firedoglake.com/diary/author/richardkanepa

Unfortunately the way Obama managed to get so many people worked up in war fever, it would be a big let down if there is a cease fire, that includes something like Sharia Law being imposed on Kabul, and denunciations by the Taliban against al Qaeda that doesn't seem to have any teeth in it, or any real ability for the Taliban to enforce their possible cease fire claim that they might arrest any returning al Qaeda from Pakistan, if a world court wants them for trial.

Again Arlen Specter's history as a go-between will be tremendously important, if hawks start shouting that Obama gave in to bad peace terms.

Somehow we all need to change the subject for a moment. Whether the war in Afghanistan continues or not may not be as important to some Muslim Militants such as Nidal Hasan who killed fellow recruits as Fort Hood, is that Iraq doesn't have US troops lounging around pushing US and Western culture around the way US troops are still doing in Korea 50 some years after the Korean War started. Militant Muslims and some who are not so militant look at Korea as a potential for the future of Iraq in a very disparaging way. The lack of and end date for the US pushing its culture on Arabs can make militants more angry than any specific action or atrocity happening on the ground. To stop the longing for a new terror attack on the US, please President Obama if necessary get French or even German or Canadian troops in Iraq for one year, or have individual GI's be able to leave for a one year stunt to be under UN command in Iraq. Or just get out and hope for the best.

Maybe as some Doves think because of Obama joining the hawks, the Afghan War won't end until during the next President there is a depression, caused by a dollar collapses from too much military spending. But there is no reason for peace activists to talk about Obama's betrayal, when Obama was hot against the Al Qaeda from the beginning for partly cross cultural reasons. The biggest thing that is likely to slow down the war is lack of fresh troops. Some in the peace movement are sitting in recruiting offices and are counteracting predatory army recruiting of false promises of specific jobs.

We are living a country where the homeless shelters have no place for late teens and those in their 20's, some soup kitchens and housing only for seniors or parents with children, with unemployment compensation and gas guzzler trade-ins being of no benefit for those without a job or a car.

Any of us for peace who are involved in any kind of helping program can lobby the program to include helping 18-year-olds, and young adults. Kids don't belong in college anymore. It's harder to get a job now, if you start off with bad credit, even if it's caused by debt incurred while in college. Peace activists instead of now trashing Obama need to struggle for a world where kids belong some place rather than the army.

Please fellow peace activists stop trashing Obama. If you want to do something radical deal with recruitment. I go so far as to be looking to create "Back Obama but not the War buttons" and by wearing them at Obama health care events.

AFTER THOUGHT 12/18
I am retired. I was around when I and others cheered President Johnson for backing Civil Right's and his Great Society programs. Then protested for peace, but didn't join those accusing him of being a baby killer.

The question is, Is their anything I or anyone else could have done to end the war when Johnson was still President? or, Can we do anything now to prevent history from repeating itself? All I know is that Johnson the ogre and Johnson the hero is the same person, not one image real and the other one fake.

My only very sightly educated guess is that Specter is the most likely to change Obama's direction. Anyone have any better guesses?

By Richard Kane

More comments are at,
http://seminal.firedoglake.com/diary/19396

I can be reached at,
http://RICHARDKANEpa.blogspot.com
or Google RichardKanePA

Comments

Sorry

but I don't trust Specter one minute past an election victory. "Somehow Specter has the image of being wishy-washy." Yup. Sure does. Specter is making nice noises now, but the nice progressive Specter will vanish in a puff of smoke the second he's assured of another term.

The following is some sad news

Sad news on the war on al Qaeda being lost because we are like an elephant fighting rabid mice, knocking over the circus tent in the process. Bad news now in Yemen,
http://seminal.firedoglake.com/diary/19267

Muslims who oppose al Qaeda was doing a good job discrediting bin Laden but the US got in the way,
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/egypt/4736358/Al-Qaeda-founder-launches-fierce-attack-on-Osama-bin-Laden.html

Specter didn't suddenly change his mind to out flank Sestak

Specter has been speaking out in the direction of peace for quite a while.

WASHINGTON D.C., Jan. 28, 2007
Senators Debate The Troop Surge
Senators Webb, Specter and McConnell Appeared On Face The Nation

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/01/28/ftn/main2405212.shtml

I presented your idea

that Specter was some sort of peacenik to the fellows that I was with today. They just guffawed. You've got a long way to go if you want to convince anybody of that!

This is how one discredits instead of empowers al Qaeda

One of Dr. Fadl's statements condemning al Qaeda,
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/egypt/4736358/Al-Qaeda-founder-launches-fierce-attack-on-Osama-bin-Laden.html

http://seminal.firedoglake.com/diary/19267#comment-108949

Thanks Rich Gardner for bringing up the subject of Specter’s pea

Thanks Rich Gardner for bringing up the subject of Specter’s peace feelers with other activists. I know you have a lot of experience and respect in the movement.

Note in the following attempt to persuade government officials, Specter’s handwritten notes besides his signature,
http://specter.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Files.View&FileStore_id=041d1e3d-508f-4e40-bdc6-b2e79f48d82f

During Vietnam, when a new official suddenly expressed even muddled doubt on the war. It was news and it was cheered by much of the anti-Vietnam War movement. During Iraq the complaint was. “Why didn’t you speak up earlier?”.

It’s going to be a long war unless this attitude changes or soldiers who signed up for they thought a specific period of time, rebel about their tours being extending into retirement age. Or more likely there will be a negotiated settlement where the Taliban will symbolically or actually give in somewhat to American demands. Or else a severe depression from ever increasing military spending, which bin Laden is doing everything to create.

By the way, it is wonderful the way Obama is taking care of veterans, unlike Bush, especially disabled ones, and all the fantastic breakthroughs in making artificial limbs behave like the original, but as the war continues this huge expense will be another step toward dollar collapse and people trying to buy goods with barter, or scarce Japanese-Euro currencies.

RichardKanePA.blogspot.com
RichardKanePA

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options