• 
• 
  • Arts & Culture
  • City Hall
  • Environment
  • Housing & Displacement
  • Immigrant Rights
  • LGBQT
  • Poverty
  • Youth & Schools
• 
  • Features
  • News Briefs
  • Newswire
  • Headlines
• 
  • Mailing Lists
  • PhillyIMC's Wiki
  • LAVA
  • Contact us
• 
• 
• 
• 

Recent Similar Articles

• > Brown Alert! Brown Dung Alert!
• > Domestic Criminal Under Influence of Drugs Allowed To Teach At Priest River Schools
• Education is a Right! PSL Community Forum


• Campaign for the Just Treatment of International Corps of Educators


• > Bad Teacher Movie Review: Alternative Media

• > NPR and PBS Anti-Iranian Propaganda
• > Proposed FCC Media Consolidation Rules
• > Former Philly Police Captain Arrested with Occupy Wall Street
• > National Public Radio's War on Free Speech
• > Major Media Liars Never Quit

Our House Is On Fire, Part 6: Who Stopped the Presses?

By David A. Love, BlackCommentator.com

The following is the sixth part of an ongoing Color of Law series.
Click here to read any of the commentaries in this series.

Who stopped the presses? Obviously, it is a question that many are asking these days.  

It is a bit sobering to witness the apparent demise of the newspaper industry. Not unlike dominoes, newspapers around the U.S. are toppling, closing their doors, filing for bankruptcy, or ceasing their print operations and only remaining online. As someone who has written op-eds for newspapers throughout the nation over the past decade, I can appreciate the importance of having a vigorous and viable press in this country. In order for true democracy to work, we need news media that will speak truth to power, that will expose, without apology, government misconduct, corporate corruption and official wrongdoing. That was the original purpose of the press, after all.  

But as someone who has always had one foot firmly planted in the independent media camp—as a former producer for Democracy Now!, former video documentary producer, a writer for a number of independent publications, and a political blogger—I understand two things: First, independent media came into being to fill a void because the mainstream media was flat on its behind. Fast asleep. Second, mainstream media have failed their mission by becoming too cozy with the powerful forces they were supposed to police.

Independent media have come to the rescue to save the public from a news industry which historically may not have reflected their reality, their perspective. For example, the Black, Latino and other ethnic press provide a crucial alternative to a media establishment which often ignores these communities, or seeks to depict them as criminals or buffoons. Progressive media provide an alternative to a mainstream press which is too often White, conservative and male centered. It is worth noting that although the nation has an African American president, the White House press corps, lacking in diversity, does not reflect this reality. But as newsrooms shrink, the diversity problem only gets worse.

To be sure, there are many good newspapers which are struggling, and unfortunately many invaluable publications which are falling or have fallen by the wayside. The reasons for their demise are various: the Internet, blogs, an unsustainable business model of providing free online content, etc.

I would suggest some additional reasons that some newspapers have failed. Too often, they simply have not served their readers, and the product, like a GM car, has lost its appeal. Many news companies— not just papers, but TV as well—are owned by corporate conglomerates and entertainment companies. This reality is reflected in the softball, celebrity gossip orientation of many so-called news outlets. Governed by the bottom line and cost-cutting measures, these papers have eliminated their City Hall beat reporters, and other reporters who are in tune with the pulse of a given city. In the absence of seasoned journalists who can actually report on anything, because those people were already laid off, these newspapers become a collection of news wires and press releases, in a pamphlet. And who is paying for that when you can read it online?

The damage has been done in terms of the giant pass that the news media have taken on the important issues of the day. During the Iraq War, the mainstream media took the opportunity to act as nationalistic cheerleaders, the propaganda arm of the Bush White House— beating the drums of war and almost celebrating the thousands upon thousands of deaths that would inevitably occur.

As cheerleaders for corporate America, the mainstream press fell asleep on the Wall Street crisis. Over-caffeinated blowhard snake-oil salesmen posing as business journalists were in abundance during the heyday of the financial sector. But where were the probing exposés on the problems of deregulation, and the thoughtful analyses on the consequences of gluttony on Wall Street?

Even as we speak, what about coverage on the thwarted assassination plots against President Obama? Or a meaningful discussion on the malicious and deleterious effects of U.S. drug policy? How about a substantive debate in the mainstream news about the madness that represents America’s gun policy, and the lethal combination of gun proliferation, economic recession and untreated mental illness—of individuals and of the society— that plays itself out in communities throughout the country?

Well, many newspapers and other corporate news venues will not offer and have not offered such valuable content. Their game is trifling and sloppy. So if they die, it wouldn’t be too soon, as they provided us little benefit in the first place. That is why people increasingly turn to independent news sources, sources such as the one you are currently reading.

The winds of change are blowing, and there is about to be a transformation in the press. We do not yet know what the world will look like when all is said and done. Perhaps mainstream and independent newspapers, and other publications will increasingly become nonprofit entities, seeking a business model that makes them truly accountable to the public. And the blogosphere has been picking up the slack, having emerged as a legitimate source for quality information that often is unavailable elsewhere. One thing is certain: independent muckraking news media with paid professional journalists, fact-gatherers and commentators must be supported if the press is to survive. 

In crisis there is opportunity. Journalists, columnists, media practitioners, bloggers, you name it, need to start conversations around the nation, if they have not already done so, on the future of the news. We have the power to start the presses again—they’ll just look a little different the next time around.

Our House is on Fire, Part 5: How About a Student Loan Bailout?

By David A. Love, BlackCommentator.com

The following is the fifth part of an ongoing Color of Law series.

Click here to read any of the commentaries in this series.

The education bubble is going to burst. It has to happen. On a daily basis, we hear about the bursting of the housing bubble. Housing values were over inflated. Millions of people found themselves with mortgages they could not afford to pay—whether through hard times and job loss, racial profiling and predatory lending by unscrupulous, avaricious banking institutions, or other reasons.

But neither can many Americans pay their college loans. Few people really talk about the unholy alliance made between institutions of higher learning and educational lenders to create a travesty in American education—that hot mess known as the student loan hustle.

Here is yet another reason why American capitalism is the scourge of the global community.

Colleges, grad schools and professional schools have become profit centers, cash cows and vocational processing plants, rather than places to expand one’s mind and understanding of the world.

And each year, the cost of a college education increases far in excess of the rate of inflation, twice the rate of inflation to be exact. Private law school tuition increased nearly three times the rate of consumer prices between 1990 and 2003. In this time of economic gloom, parents—financially straightjacketed, perhaps unemployed or underemployed, no savings, or their investment portfolios eviscerated— cannot afford to send their children to school.

According to the College Board, the average cost of four years at a private college is $136,000, $57,000 at a public university. Meanwhile, the student loan industry makes $85 billion a year. Federal loans are at $544 billion, up $42 billion from 2008. And students borrowed a record $17.3 billion in private student loans in 2005-6, a 913% increase from a decade earlier. In 2008, according to FinAid.org, there was nearly $131 billion in outstanding private student loans. These private loans, the fastest segment of the student loan market, often have exorbitant and variable interest rates, highly punitive late fees and charges, and are based on the borrower’s credit rating rather than his or her need. Thanks to the power of the student loan industry— and hack politicians who believe we must leave no corporation behind—these loans, unlike mortgage foreclosures, are not covered by bankruptcy protection.

And then there are those unscrupulous and unduly influenced university officials who accept kickbacks, gifts, trips, revenue sharing agreements and other goodies from the lenders (who are eager to earn even more profits on the backs of students), in exchange for access to students. Andrew Cuomo, New York State attorney general, uncovered much of this scandal in a 2007 investigation. For example, the financial aid director at the University of Southern California owned 1,500 shares of Education Lending Group, parent company of the university’s preferred lender, Student Loan Xpress. In addition, the financial aid directors at Columbia University and University of Texas owned stock in that company, with the former selling his shares at a $100,000 profit. All three officers were terminated by their respective universities. The director of student financial services at Johns Hopkins University resigned after Cuomo’s probe revealed that she had received $65,000 from Student Loan Xpress, giving the impression that she was an employee of the lending company rather than of the university. And Matteo Montana, a Bush Department of Education official, held at least 10,500 shares (at least $100,000) of the company’s stock, and he was supposed to be overseeing that lender, as well as others who participated in the Federal Family Education Loan Program (FFELP).

When greed rules the student loan process—not unlike financial deregulation and the Wall Street meltdown, the Madoff scandal, and the subprime mortgage mess— no one is looking out for the interests of ordinary students. The result is that students get shafted, and the banks and their enablers get rich. People of meager or modest means, just hoping for education as a way up and a way out, are crushed under the weight of loans they cannot afford to pay when they graduate. They emerge no better, or even worse off, than the previous generation, with six-figure, mortgage-sized indebtedness, and monthly payments that exceed all other expenses, if not their entire paycheck. Some young people must forego homeownership because they cannot afford a mortgage, or must live with their parents until things get better, if they ever get better.

But in this system of American capitalism, where education provides false and empty promises of hefty rewards, not everyone is even supposed to have a job. The proliferation of prisons for the surplus population—in Dickensian fashion—and the doling out of tax breaks for corporations that move jobs overseas, provide more than ample proof of that proposition. High college debt levels drive people into corporate jobs they might not want, but there are not nearly enough of those jobs available for those who want them, in any case. For evidence, look at the legions of thousands who are being shown the door in corporations and law firms throughout the country right now. Often, those who prefer a public interest job must forego a career of community service, dismiss it as financially unsustainable, or choose that potentially perilous path only through extreme personal sacrifice and a commitment to a life of near impoverishment—that is, just a stone’s throw away from the plight of some of their clients.

What is missing here is that education can and should be an enriching experience, to build character and knowledge, and create productive members of society. But for many, it appears that is not worth the cost. And yet, why isn’t education considered a civil right, a human right? Why isn’t it free, or at least close to it? And if AIG, Citibank, General Motors and other corporations deserve a financial bailout, what about the debilitated student loan debtors? What about a national student loan forgiveness program? Let’s wipe the slate clean and start anew. A Facebook group was created to call for just that, to petition Congress to eliminate the estimated $600 billion or more in U.S. student debt, on the grounds that doing so would stimulate the economy. The Facebook group has nearly 167,000 members.

Is there hope on the horizon? Well, as a start, President Obama wants to eliminate the role of private industry in the federally guaranteed student loan program. This step would eliminate the $4 billion in annual government subsidies to these private companies, which include such big names as Citigroup, SallieMae, Bank of America and JPMorgan Chase.

Also, under The College Cost Reduction and Access Act of 2007, monthly federal student loan payments are capped at 10% of a debtor’s gross income for 25 years. The rest of the debt is forgiven.

In addition, Rev. Jesse Jackson is leading a campaign called Reduce The Rate. The movement is calling for Congress to do the following:

1) Reduce the interest rate on all student loans to 1%, the same rate the banks enjoy;

2) Extend the grace period before loan repayment begins from 6 months after graduation to 18 months;

3) End the penalties assessed to schools for student loan defaults, and

4) Increase Pell Grants to cover the average yearly cost of a public 4 year institution, rather than the amounts in the current stimulus package (which are $5,350 starting July 1, 2009, and $5,550 in 2010-2011).

What happens next will depend on public pressure, and the power of youth and others whose voices were heard in the 2008 election. To be sure, the influence of Wall Street insiders in the Obama administration, individuals such as Treasury secretary Timothy Geithner and Lawrence Summers, is by no means encouraging. And the pimps and prostitutes for the student loan industry who double as members of Congress will do what they can to stop any further pushes toward that ever-dreaded “European-style socialism”. We shall see. If nothing else, it will be interesting to watch.

--David A. Love is a human rights advocate and journalist based in Philadelphia. He is a member of the editorial board of BlackCommentator.com, where his Color of Law column appears weekly. He is a contributor to the Progressive Media Project, McClatchy-Tribune News Service, In These Times and Philadelphia Independent Media Center. He contributed to the book, States of Confinement: Policing, Detention and Prisons (St. Martin's Press, 2000), and is a former producer of the radio news magazine Democracy Now! Love is also a former spokesperson for the Amnesty International UK National Speakers Tour, and organized the first national police brutality conference as a staff member with the New York-based Center for Constitutional Rights. He served as a law clerk to two Black federal judges. Love is a graduate of Harvard College and the University of Pennsylvania Law School. He also attended Harvard Business School, and completed the Joint Programme in International Human Rights Law at the University of Oxford.