Pro-Lifers Against Sarah Palin
by
| 10.06.2008
I am trying to form “Pro-Lifers Against Sarah Palin’s Extremism”. I would have liked to just call this organization “Pro-Lifers Against Extremism”. However when one Googgles, Pro-Lifers Against Extremism” Libertarians for Life, a group that worries about rape victims’ rights but not about the rights of a women who suddenly feel they are enslaved with a baby after her Prince Charming turns into a monster,
http://www.capitolhillblue.com/cont/node/11465
There was one posting on Sarah Palin and Hunting “Two Kids With Gun’s” written by an apparent non-vegetarian non-animal rights activist that was more effective than all the vegetarians who condemned her on that issue. Some postings get spread from one blog to another on its own, like the “Ballad of Sarah Palin” or “If you grow up in Hawaii, raised by your grandparents”. Moderate viewpoints shrilly stated are very important.
I personally would like to see a US policy to discourage abortion very similar to the anti-smoking campaigns, and wish it wasn’t only extreme feminists who were making shrill statements on this issue.
In my mind Sarah Palin when she was mayor, preventing the city from paying for rape kids, just to prevent pro-abortion doctors from getting money from the city, or women’s groups, makes my own personal feelings against abortion embarrassing. What about a rape victim who the police suggested to go to Planned Parenthood to help her pay for the rape kit to discover who raped her, but hated Planned Parenthood and thus never went there to get help in paying for it. Not only was she raped, but in debt to the city for being raped, maybe even never getting help in discovering and capturing the man who raped her.
In the old days according to traditional morals only some men killed in war. Then there was a draft and other changes. Joan of Arc sponsored the idea of women soldiers, and al Qaeda and al Qaeda of Iraq, not necessary the same organization, added to it the idea of children and infant combatants and of combatants with severe disability issues -- people equipping their own children with disability issues or their own Down’s syndrome mother as a suicide bomber.
In order to try to have rules of warfare both sides have to gain something from the agreement. And the US has yet to suffer from child combatants. Therefore I urge Israel and its Muslim neighbors to agree, to keep woman and children out of the armed services. I know if I extend this point further I will be sticking my foot in my mouth (but I will continue anyway). Allowing openly gay people in the army is another step toward allowing more groups to kill and die, one more step toward the road toward allowing children, babies and those with severe disability issues to be the armed service. Without talking extremes, I am sure that there are circumstances where someone with extreme disability issues could become a very competent fighter pilot. I have a friend who likes to sit in at army reciting offices demanding that they be signed up not their grand kids. I warned that if any these old ladies, knew Arabic, and were skilled in computers they might end up in the Army instead of in jail for refusing to leave the premises.
Circumstances didn’t allow Sarah Palin to be, in her mind a soldier, to carry a gun in God’s physical army against Satan. However her fetish for hunting, competing in sports, and building over sized sports stadiums shows she may be getting as close as circumstance allows to physically fighting in God’s army against Satan. A 42 year old woman on estrogen who already had four children purposely conceiving a child, may show that she considers conceiving that child to be part of God’s war against Satan. I agree that it is much more fair, to that child, to let him live than to have aborted him. I want to believe, though I am not sure I really do, that it was in that child’s interest not to be aborted back when it was a fertilized egg.
Before conception, did that child have a right to be conceived, brings up the question of eugenics. As soon as one mentions eugenics we think of Hitler, and rightly so. However, Stalin with the help of a crack pot scientist called Lysenko called breading plants and animals fascism and forbid farmers to breed cows or corn. Society faces a dilemma whether or not to allow a genetically blind and/or deaf parent to abort kids who are not deaf and/or blind like herself. But to me it is clearly morally wrong, not morally right, for women on estrogen to have mostly Down’s syndrome kids, even though I realize that I am in a small way agreeing with Hitler to say this. It can’t be only up to the mother to conceive a child that has extreme disability issues, or genetically engineered to be extremely different. Soon it may be possible to genetically engineer a child to be nine feet tall trying to create the fastest runner, but the first try may mean a child with severe back problems.
Much of the world watch little Michael Jackson being denied a childhood. Behavior scientists say free casual play is very important in a child’s development. Does Sarah Palin’s children have to spend much of their lives waving at a camera, or can they freely play around, once in a while.
We humans claim to be either pro-life, pro-choice or in-between in our views. Most aren’t total extremists who would believe it would be alright for tissue bank factories to be set up similar to the surrogate mother factories, where women in India earn a living being segregate mothers every nine months, but in the tissue factories instead of making babies being paid to have abortions every 7 or eight months for medical or experimental use. On the other extreme few would agree with then Mayor Palin preventing the city from paying for rape kids to prevent women’s groups and pro-abortion doctors from getting any of that money.
A somewhat related subject, when we condemn people who think they are doing God’s Will, if we are not careful how we praise it, we may be besides criticizing people like bin Laden also subtly unknowingly also criticizing people like Mother Teresa and Martin Luther King who also thought their life’s work had something to do with God’s Will.
Instead of claiming “Abortion is Murder, I would like to claim, “Cigarette Smoking is Murder”, and dream of a policy where even a rape victim would be ever so gently discouraged from having one. Sarah Palin, unless she becomes President, and like Margaret Thatcher in England who created a huge backlash, might have no effect on abortion policy or such issues as the Second Amendment. Palin likes guns but not the Bill of Rights in general. As President the loyalty oath toward owing a gun to join the militia, mentioned in the 2nd Amendment, will probably include swearing ones allegiance to God. Today people who condemned Bush too hard have trouble flying in a plane. President Palin may be so strict on how she defines loyalty that half the present members of the NRA may discover that they have trouble renewing their license to carry a gun.
Unfortunately, Sarah Palin most lasting influence could be on what it means to be a woman in this country and even the world, a sweet looking sneaky snake. I wish that there was something I could say to make this kind of future less likely.
http://www.capitolhillblue.com/cont/node/11465 http://phillyimc.org/en/node/75713
Google RichardKanePA
Comments
Good luck with this one
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 10/06/2008 - 7:33pmYou aren't going to get prolifers in any number worth counting. Now pro death, feminazis, shit they are all around you.
Heh
Submitted by Rich Gardner on Mon, 10/06/2008 - 10:35pmYep, gotta keep them women barefoot and pregnant. Keep 'em slaving over the stove and tending to kids all day. Can't have them getting any ideas 'bout careers or lives of their own or nothin'.
It's strange how different the comments are at another sight
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 10/07/2008 - 11:42amhttp://capitolhillblue.com/cont/node/11465
http://capitolhillblue.com/cont/blog/2419
Post new comment