home
PhillyIMC's web-radio  

Ecuador's Constitution Gives Rights to Nature

by

The new constitution gives nature the "right to exist, persist, maintain and regenerate its vital cycles, structure, functions and its processes in evolution" and mandates that the government take "precaution and restriction measures in all the activities that can lead to the extinction of species, the destruction of the ecosystems or the permanent alteration of the natural cycles."

texaco2.jpg

Jaguars, spectacled bears, brown-headed spider monkeys, and plate-billed mountain toucans may all just breathe a little easier next week if Ecuadorians approve a new constitution in a referendum on Sunday that would grant these threatened animals' habitats with inalienable rights.

The new constitution gives nature the "right to exist, persist, maintain and regenerate its vital cycles, structure, functions and its processes in evolution" and mandates that the government take "precaution and restriction measures in all the activities that can lead to the extinction of species, the destruction of the ecosystems or the permanent alteration of the natural cycles."

"I think a lot of eyes will be on Ecuador this weekend" said Mari Margil, Associate Director of the Community Environmental Legal Defense Fund.

Margil and other members of the Defense Fund were invited as a result of their environmental litigation and legislative work with municipalities in the United States. They made several trips to Montecristi over the last year where they worked with members of Ecuador's constitutional assembly on drafting legally enforceable Rights of Nature, which Margil believes marks a watershed in the trajectory of environmental law.

Dr. Mario Melo, a lawyer specializing in Environmental Law and Human Rights and an advisor to Fundación Pachamama-Ecuador, said that the new constitution redefines people's relationship with nature by asserting that nature is not just an object to be appropriated and exploited by people, but is rather a rights-bearing entity that should be treated with parity under the law.

"In this sense, the new constitution reflects the traditions of indigenous peoples living in Ecuador, who see nature as a mother and call her by a proper name, Pachamama," said Melo.

Challenging Corporate Power

Ecuador's leadership on this issue just may have a global domino effect as the Defense Fund is now fielding calls from other countries such as Nepal, which is currently writing its first constitution. This could begin to make neoliberal development models obsolete and have a tremendous impact on multinational corporations, especially those in the extractive industries, from entering new markets and conducting "business as usual".

"I expect them to fight it," said the Defense Fund's Margil. "Their bread and butter is being able to treat countries and ecosystems like cheap hotels. Multinational corporations are dependent on ravaging the planet in order to increase their bottom line."

The class-action lawsuit in Ecuador against Chevron is a testament to Margil's forecast. Tens of thousands of Ecuadorians accuse the California-based company of dumping millions of gallons of toxic waste into the Amazon (when it was formerly Texaco), and as a result causing massive environmental destruction and widespread health problems. Chevron, which could be forced to pay as much as $16 billion $16 billion, refuses to take responsibility and calls the action a "shakedown".

 

"The ultimate issue here is Ecuador has mistreated a U.S. company," a Chevron lobbyist who asked not to be identified told Newsweek in July. "We can't let little countries screw around with big companies like this-companies that have made big investments around the world."

Chevron is lobbying Congress to squeeze Ecuador on the issue by threatening to withhold the renewal of the Andean Trade Preference Act. Chevron took similar measures in 2006 by lobbying for the exclusion of Ecuador from Andean Free Trade Agreement negotiations as retribution for the lawsuit--something Democratic Presidential nominee Senator Barack Obama (D-Ill) and Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT) criticized at the time in a letter to then U.S. Trade Representative Rob Portman.

Jorge Daniel Taillant, President of the Center for Human Rights and Environment (in Argentina), recently wrote that, "The crude reality of the Chevron lobbyist comment, brings home what few politicians or oil industry representatives want to admit, that our societies have been unsuccessful in properly balancing our need for oil and containing the negative impacts that this industry has on our natural and social environment."

It is this lack of success, as vindicated by the symptoms of global warming, and which are becoming all too apparent, that for Margil emphasize the urgent need to try something different, like what's being proposed in Ecuador. But even this might not be far enough.

Populist Greenwashing?

For all of the hope and tangible progress the Rights of Nature articles in Ecuador's proposed constitution represent, there are shortcomings and contradictions with the laws and the political reality on the ground.

Carlos Zorrilla, executive director of Defensa y Conservación Ecológica de Intag, who has been a tireless defender of Pachamama against transnational mining companies such as Canada's Ascendant Copper (which recently changed its name to Copper Mesa Mining Corp.), takes a more skeptical approach to the proposed laws.

"It sounds great," said Zorilla, "but in practice governments like [President] Correa's will argue that funding his political project, which will bring 'well being and relieve poverty', overules the rights of nature because the best technology will be used and mining and other extractive industries will be, of course, sustainable."

The articles place the responsibility of carrying out these laws largely to the government, though it does give citizens and communities legal recourse if its determined that the government is failing in its responsibilities.

"It comes down to the government doing what is the will of the people," said an optimistic Margil.

But Zorrilla, along with many other critics from social movements, point to Correa's refusal to include in the constitution a clause mandating free, prior and informed consent by communities for any development project that would of affect their local ecosystems, as well as the Correa Administration's embrace of an extractive economic model of development, although one with greater State control.

"They aren’t issues you can reconcile," said environmental lawyer Melo. "On various occasions, President Correa has stated his will to amplify border-region projects for the extraction of natural resources, especially petroleum and metals, and this can only be done in Ecuador at the cost of natural resources important for their biodiversity, since they are the source of rivers and the homes of local communities. The Constitution Project, on the contrary, promotes a development model oriented towards ‘good living’ ('buen vivir'), which means living in harmony with nature and strengthening environmental rights for this end. This contradiction, between Correa’s statements and ‘buen vivir’, will probably provoke an intensification of socio-environmental conflicts in the coming years."

Despite any shortcomings, the eyes of the world should stay on Ecuador beyond this weekend's vote when the constitution will most likely pass. If history is any indicator, Ecuadorians will fight for the Rights of Nature, with or without President Correa.

Based in Philadelphia, Cyril Mychalejko is an editor at www.UpsideDownWorld.org.

Comments

Several months before, or in

Several months before, or in December, Botsoy Vale, farmer leader and elected Kagawad, was tortured and killed by the NPA. The latter death was claimed officially by the Jose Rapsing Command of the NPA. Around the time of his death, a death list was issued by the revolutionary armed groups,

Thanks

I don’t think that all the articles will remain in the mind without missing a single word whichever we read. I think this article done a great job.What a best way to describe your view. Thanks for sharing with us. Really like your informative article.
Hopefully we will get more interesting topic from you in future.

This is a great move. I mean

This is a great move. I mean nature and the environment surely has the right to exist, if it's not for them, then it's for humanity. This certain move of the Ecuador government should be an example to all the developed countries.

Articles place the

Articles place the responsibility of carrying out these laws largely to the government, though it does give citizens and communities legal recourse if its determined that the government is failing in its responsibilities.

Yeah I really think it is a

Yeah I really think it is a necessary step that governments need to take in order to protect the environment from corporations. At least if ruining part of the environment is necessary there will be a review process first.

Good to hear

It is definitely good to hear that the government (in this case, the government of Ecuador) is doing some drastic actions to save our environment. I agree in their actions to challenge the corporate power. It is such a shame to hear that California-based petrol company Chevron is dumping millions of gallons of toxic waste into the Amazon. They should be more responsible with their actions because it clearly has a direct effect to our nature.

I recently came accross your

I recently came accross your blog and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my first comment. I dont know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice blog.

he Canadian and American

he Canadian and American governments want to set an example to the hundreds of US refuseniks who have taken refuge in Canada

Government have taken some

Government have taken some initiatives for Environment protection- that's a awesome news.

I'm agree with you, the

I'm agree with you, the governemetn had to take his own responsability and quickly ! Thx for sharing these infos !

Hmm..thanks to admin.One

Hmm..thanks to admin.One graduate, James Rose, reacted to Abu-Jamal's speech by stating, "I was inspired by Mumia's speech. His voice and words invoked a renewed commitment to truth and compassion, a commitment I need to practice every day.

This is a great news. Good

This is a great news. Good to see the governments coming up to save their nature and environment. It is never too late.

Interesting for a reverse phone

Thank you for posting

Thank you

This is a great news. Good to see the governments coming up to save their nature and environment. It is never too late.

Thank you

This is a great news. Good to see the governments coming up to save their nature and environment. It is never too late.

Someone one has to stand up

Someone one has to stand up for it. And everything comes for a price. These are issues because of lack of political will and lobbying by big corporations. - Brad.

The Oil companies

The oil companies have been getting away with murder for way too long , literally.

It is definitely good to

It is definitely good to hear that the government is doing some drastic actions to save our environment. It concerns education also.
Term paper topics

Thanks

Wow, that was heart provoking article presented by you sir
thanks for sharing
regards

I am agree with you, thx for

I am agree with you, thx for sharing its a nice topic !

Hi

Thank you juice that sharing this.
Gary Winnick

This is good

Mexico was on the verge of toppling the government before the Swine Flu strike them hard. Looks like a big conspiracy.
______________________

Neck Pain | Singapore Hotel

Its about time that someone

Its about time that someone stood up and looked at what we are destroying every day species become extinct from our planet all because of man's destruction. Houses for sale | Sell my house fast

This is good

Mexico was on the verge of toppling the government before the Swine Flu strike them hard. Looks like a big conspiracy.

Thanks for Posting. It was

Thanks for Posting. It was nice to read.

Azher
Top Colleges in India

I'm glad to hear that

I'm glad to hear that somebody is doing real job while the rest corrupt the nature and spend the sources. Is this normal state of the things? I think not. And you?

nice article. web

good info. Seo

re:

The one thing that we can see around us is the plant. I have gardening at home i love it everytime i get relax. It refers to natural environment or wilderness- in general areas that have not been substantially altered by humans, or which persist despite human intervention. Check this Natural Environment and Ecosystem thats at docfiles.org

re:

The one thing that we can see around us is the plant. I have gardening at home i love it everytime i get relax. It refers to natural environment or wilderness- in general areas that have not been substantially altered by humans, or which persist despite human intervention. Check this Natural Environment and Ecosystem thats at docfiles.org

re:

The one thing that we can see around us is the plant. I have gardening at home i love it everytime i get relax. It refers to natural environment or wilderness- in general areas that have not been substantially altered by humans, or which persist despite human intervention. Check this Natural Environment and Ecosystem thats at docfiles.org

re:

The one thing that we can see around us is the plant. I have gardening at home i love it everytime i get relax. It refers to natural environment or wilderness- in general areas that have not been substantially altered by humans, or which persist despite human intervention. Check this Natural Environment and Ecosystem thats at docfiles.org

Long live our planet

It is also my opinion, it was the Government to take full responsibility for the implementation of these laws of nature. Long live our planet!

Hey! Thanks for the blog

Hey! Thanks for the blog post! I find it very fascinating. I will mark this psot and return. can you tell me where I can find more information about this? Keep it up

THANKS FOR HELP. I found

THANKS FOR HELP.
I found Google to thank you for good job.
well work again.

I agree with this and must

I agree with this and must to say that Mexico was on the verge of toppling the government before the Swine Flu strike them hard. Looks like a big conspiracy.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.