Police critics arrested, home seized in police raid!
by
Pete Tridish | 06.13.2008
June 13th, 2008 — Philadelphia Police descended upon the home of homeowners who have been questioning police tactics in Mayor Nutter's new "stop and frisk" program. 4 residents were arrested in their home at 17th street and Ridge Avenue, and the police are in the process of sealing the building. The homeowners are being held at the police station, no charges have yet been filed. Read More | UPDATE 6/14 | UPDATE 6/16 | City Paper article
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 14:19:36 -0700 (PDT)
From: Prometheus Radio Project <info@prometheusradio.org>
Subject: Police critics arrested, home seized in police raid.
Police critics arrested, home seized in police raid.
June 13th, 2008. Philadelphia Police descended upon the home of homeowners
who have been questioning police tactics in Mayor Nutters new "stop and
frisk" program. 4 residents were arrested in their home at 17th street and
Ridge Avenue, and the police are in the process of sealing the building.
The homeowners are being held at the police station, no charges have yet
been filed.
Homeowners had been circulating petitions calling upon Mayor Nutter and
Police Commissioner Ramsey to attend community meetings on the use of
excessive force, surveilance cameras, and the new "stop and frisk"
policy. The mayor and police chief have declined to attend these community
forums, but instead have seized the home and possessions of those who
question "Stop and Frisk," and are currently holding them in jail. While
many civil liberties advocates and residents of affected neighborhoods
have questioned the new police tactics, few imagined that simple criticism
of a city policy could result in the seizure of one's home and subject
residents to arrest.
More details coming soon.
contact:
Danielle Redden 267-243-5231 dredden@critpath.org
Jade Walker 215-939-2386 kaleliberation@yahoo.com
Prometheus Radio Project
"Freeing the Airwaves from Corporate Control!"
prometheusradio.org
(215)727-9620
P.O. Box 42158 Philadelphia, PA 19101
Comments
Obvious Police State Tactics
Submitted by Brent (not verified) on Sat, 06/14/2008 - 5:30pmIt's sad to see people in a neighborhood I know very well arrested for expressing their very valid concerns over excessive political and police presence. I lived on Leland Street right before Nutter took office. The police attitude toward people in Philadelphia, the surrounding counties and throughout this country has become increasingly aggressive toward the people they have sworn to protect and serve. We lost the support of our politicians long ago and the muscle for those politicians, such as, the police, military and intelligence services have followed suit. This is only a sign of the things to come and shows that the rhetoric used by politicians is simply that and the true intentions of the actions they promote are concealed between their words not in them.
Philadelphians have some of the most rebellious and free thinking minds left in this country, especially those that have been disenfranchised by the system - of which there are many, and the politicians know this; hence the necessity to pacify those responsible for cultivating that free and critical thinking, rebellious mentality. There is too much emphasis on voting for a certain type of elected official because they share our values or they represent a popular view on an imaginary left to right scale and not enough emphasis on our community and neighbors who do the same. People have become so disconnected that they truly believe those in government, at any level, truly want to help us. The only person that will empower you and I is YOU AND I! Not Nutter, not the police commissioner, not the military, and certainly not Obama, Bush or McCain. YOU AND I thats it. You and I the common man and woman outnumber the elitist backward thinkers 20 to 1 or more. Stop putting Faith in false prophets and starting putting your faith and energy in protecting people like those arrested for no other reason than stressing these truths.
Get Involved!
Submitted by B (not verified) on Sun, 10/26/2008 - 12:04amTired of the rhetoric and B.S.? Check out www.RestoretheRepulic.net. Meet up with like-minded freedom loving individuals who are committed in their continued vigilance to wage a freedom campaign to take back our country.
it seems pretty obvious
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 06/15/2008 - 12:17amI think the Move housebombing the recent police beating of "suspects" and this raid indicates how the police feel towards their citizenry.
Any illusions?
rights being violated
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 06/15/2008 - 12:43amThey are violating people's rights man. They can't do that and expect us to just sit back and watch our friends get locked up.
police raid
Submitted by Jon Pisano (not verified) on Sun, 06/15/2008 - 11:02amYour comments regarding this matter seem to lack facts. Do you REALLY believe the Police would raid those homes without probable cause. Did they have warrants? Were DRUGS involved. I believe the answer is YES. It is common practice to seal drug houses. Y'all need to get a life and stop blaming others for your shortcomings
No drugs, No warrant. They
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 06/15/2008 - 12:21pmNo drugs, No warrant. They did get a warrant after the fact, but there were never any charges pressed. Those are facts.
Re: police raid
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 06/15/2008 - 1:08pmPolice raid homes without probable cause all the time. Court throw out illegally gathered evidence every day. So the answer to your question is YES. Further, evidence gathered inside a house when the police only have probable cause and nothing more is still unconstitutional (violative of the 4th amendment's search and seizure clause). Police need either (1) voluntary consent, (2) a warrant, (3) probable cause AND exigent circumstances that the evidence is going to be destroyed.
See http://www.lectlaw.com/def/e063.htm and
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exigent_circumstance
If you are going to try to quote the law like you know something, maybe you should try actually knowing something first.
I've been to this house
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 06/16/2008 - 9:32amI've been to this house several times. There are NO DRUGs there. Just community activists.
Got some facts?
Submitted by seand (not verified) on Sun, 06/15/2008 - 10:58amRamsey has not even announced when and where they might be introducing Targeted Enforcement Zones against people illegally carrying guns. It makes not one whit of sense why there would be some grand conspiracy against 4 "activist" types for misleadingly complaining about a policy they are not even ready to unroll yet.
Just one question, do folks in this thread support stronger gun laws and if so how do they suppose the city set about the business of reducing the number of illegal weapons being carried on the streets, weapons that end up being used to kill people again and again in petty beefs that get out of control?
From my perspective the anti-"stop-and-frisk" crowd might as well carry signs saying "I Heart Senseless Gun Violence, Especially When Crossfire Takes Down Children and Innocents" because that is the end result of their mistating the facts and aims of "stop-and-frisk" - but hey thats just me.
You guys should at least know the theory behind the policy you seek to criticize. Take a look at the Kansas City Gun Experiment:
http://guide.helpingamericasyouth.gov/programdetail.cfm?id=349
Targeted enforcement against illegal guns in "hot spots" with control areas where the same policy was not employed. There was no dramatic surge in other types of arrests but in the area where intensive enforcement against carrying illegal guns was employed the number of gun crimes dropped by 49%. Philly can use a drop of gun crimes by 49%, in my humble opinion.
Police state tactics
Submitted by miker (not verified) on Thu, 06/19/2008 - 3:47pmWhile you may feel that opposition to stop and frisk unfounded and misguided, you cannot say that part of the policy includes confiscating the homes and possessions of those who oppose.
The issue here is not the targeted enforcement against illegal guns in "hot spots", but the attacks on law-abiding citizens and their right to speak their minds with their neighbors without fear of the government or any other entity stealing their homes and property.
A cogent debate on stop & frisk is warranted, and should probably be brought up as a separate article in the newswire. Nevertheless, one cannot defend the arrests of these 4 from their homes based on the validity of Nutter & Ramsey's experimental gun policing policy.
Similar Behavior of NYPD
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 06/15/2008 - 1:13pmhttp://mxgm.org/web/organizational-news/charges-dismissed-against-mxgm-c...
Police containment and
Submitted by Arturo Castillon (not verified) on Mon, 06/16/2008 - 12:20amPolice containment and criminalization of a community will not succeed in persuading or forcing its members to stop carrying weapons, yet alone foster social development. The police, just like other agents of capitalism and the state, are not able ameliorate a situation that has been created by exploitation and oppression. The only type of action that would do that is, I believe, diametrically opposed to what Mayor Nutter and Police Commissioner Ramsey want. We need to be realistic here, regardless of if the people who got arrested broke the sacred law or not; is an increase in arrests for carrying weapons going to stop people from shooting each other? Is giving the police more power going to make the communities involved safer for its members? Or is Philly increasingly going perpetuate its legacy as a police state which it obviously has not yet abandoned? Instead of naively hoping that the police can solve a problem which they themselves are part and parcel of, we should vigorously focus our efforts towards fighting and resisting the conditions which facilitate and create violence and crime in some of the poorest areas of Philly.
Great Response "Arturo C."
Submitted by Brent (not verified) on Tue, 06/17/2008 - 6:43amGreat Response "Arturo C." on one of many ways to resolve issues faced by our community. People who believe locking up everyone in the community who are involved in actions that thrive in the economic conditions they see and relate to everyday in everyway are out of touch. People quote Fox news and other idiot Main Stream Media sources and throw out unfounded statistics that do not have context and are without any moral backbone. The mentality towards others needs to change. Funding our school system with the money paid to these police officers would yield comparable statistics and would not disenfranchize many children in the process. It would empower parents and give them a sense of purpose. There are many other avenues to take to resolve these problems but the neighborhoods considered least desirable will not be given an opportunity to recover instead more police pressence is there answer. People who support more police on the street fail to realize that unless you plan on keeping those police there it is a temporary fix. This type of backward thinking will also lead to a serious disconnection between that community and those assigned to protect them, not occupy there territoy. I oppose it not because I want more kids to be shot, that is a response I expect of a person who can't or won't think outside the box provided by the wonderful media, I oppose it because it is not going to remedy the "cause" of ignorance or violence in our community - but only temporarily hinder its effects.
Great Response "Arturo C."
Submitted by Brent (not verified) on Tue, 06/17/2008 - 6:44amGreat Response "Arturo C." on one of many ways to resolve issues faced by our community. People who believe locking up everyone in the community who are involved in actions that thrive in the economic conditions they see and relate to everyday in every way are out of touch. People quote Fox news and other idiot Main Stream Media sources and throw out unfounded statistics that do not have context and are without any moral backbone. The mentality towards others needs to change. Funding our school system with the money paid to these police officers would yield comparable statistics and would not disenfranchise many children in the process. It would empower parents and give them a sense of purpose. There are many other avenues to take to resolve these problems but the neighborhoods considered least desirable will not be given an opportunity to recover instead more police presence is there answer. People who support more police on the street fail to realize that unless you plan on keeping those police there it is a temporary fix. This type of backward thinking will also lead to a serious disconnection between that community and those assigned to protect them, not occupy there territory. I oppose it not because I want more kids to be shot, that is a response I expect of a person who can't or won't think outside the box provided by the wonderful media, I oppose it because it is not going to remedy the "cause" of ignorance or violence in our community - but only temporarily hinder its effects.
"is an increase in arrests
Submitted by seand (not verified) on Mon, 06/16/2008 - 10:24am"is an increase in arrests for carrying weapons going to stop people from shooting each other?"
Yes it is, by up to 49% according to the Kansas City Study. What facts, studies do you have to back up your suggestion it won't?
"Is giving the police more power going to make the communities involved safer for its members?"
Depends on how its administered. I trust Nutter and Ramsey more to make an intelligent thought out response to the epidemic of violence in this city than I trust someone like you, "anonymous", to. Its clear to me from your tone you are psychologically invested in "radicalism for radicalisms sake" rather than in a coherent look at what will improve people's lives.
Interesting article about Nutter and Ramsey's handling of community relations, BTW.
http://www.philly.com/philly/hp/news_update/19241549.html
I'm quite confident that at the end of the day this will turn out to have been driven by the Feds - which is bad news for the activists in the house.
My name is Arturo Castillon,
Submitted by Arturo Castillon (not verified) on Tue, 06/17/2008 - 10:05amMy name is Arturo Castillon, I wrote it that way, not "anonymous", you pinche gringo. That statistic is completely arbitrary, it has nothing to do with the specific problems we face in Philly, anyways that just means that more people are getting caught and thrown in jail, not that violence is being reduced in any significant way. Im going to make it very clear for all you spineless liberal cabrones out there: the police are never going to improve our lives, only we can do that by taking back control of our communities and our destinies our selves. We will never have peace if we rely on the police to enforce it, or by relying on neocolonial puppets like Nutter and Ramsey (white power in a black face anyone?) whose main concern is protecting the interests of their own class and power. They do this by increasingly making it harder for the poorest sectors of society, also the most revolutionary, to arm themselves, by giving the racist police more power than us in controlling our own communities, by aiding the gentrification of our neighborhoods, by criminalizing us, by constantly and violently reminding us that we do not have any power over our lives, and that the overseers know whats best, not us. Now, this may sound scary and intimidating to those who have a stake in the established order of things and who want the way power is distributed to stay the same. But it is not "radicalism for radicalisms sake", it is a realistic, not an opportunistic, analysis of what is going on and what it is going to take for us to live in peaceful communities where we can self-manage our own affairs and democratically administer policies that affect us through means of coordination and cooperation, not police invasion and militarization.
Time to pick up the gun.....
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 06/16/2008 - 10:59pmClearly, this isn't legal. This is little different than how politics are imposed in so-called third world dictatorships.
Agreed. People should arm
Submitted by Brent (not verified) on Tue, 06/17/2008 - 6:50amAgreed. People should arm themselves before the people in favor of more police on our streets push for the ban of guns by civilians. A wonderful combination indeed for those who support tyranny by government. 1939 Germany here we come...
might we focus?
Submitted by tyler jack (not verified) on Wed, 06/18/2008 - 12:46amum.
could we have a more focused discussion here? this isn't about "stop and frisk" anymore- and it is most certainly not about drugs. it may be about wider, national issues.
but mostly its about the philadelphia police being so out of line about critisism and petition drives- both rights in our country that people from all sides of the political spectrum use to get things done- that they raided a house without a warrant, seized the homeowners' belongings, and threw them in jail without charges for the night. and thats just the completely illegal part. Next they screwed them from here 'til sunday the LEGAL way by calling in L&I to throw the book at them.
What will police come and take YOUR home away for critisising? the Fraternal Order of Police is completely, utterly, horrifyingly OUT OF CONTROL. I have lived in and visited many cities in the United States and I have never, ever seen anything like the horrifying situation we have here in Philadelphia. Its completely out of hand. I've heard terrible, terrible things about the police force in this city that- as many critisisms of police and the structuree they are apart of as i may have- i would never DREAM of happening in any other place i have lived in or seen.
this situation is such a scenario.
What is the community that reads this blog going to do about this completely horrifying situation? We might consider:
- publisizing the event to the public ourselves, without the Daily News' schlock-like slant(GOD did anyone see that insanity?!).
- protesting in the streets
- meeting with city officials in constant and angry groups to demand change(which- in recent history- should have happened as soon as the "Blue by Day, White by Night" KKK stuckers were discovered in police lockers- or as soon as all the officers who beat teh living shit out of those three unarmed men a little whiel back wasn't FIRED outright).
- continuing whatever work these people got screwed over for the sake of - petitions, critisiss of police brutality- tenfold and en masse, so that next time they have to raid twenty or a hundred houses instead of one
- getting a fund or benefit set up for the people who got evicted, and for the undoubtedly mindboggling repairs L&I will now demand from the homeowners
what is being DONE about this situation? god its f-ed up.
"Pigs"
Submitted by Jim Kennedy-Hennessey (not verified) on Wed, 06/18/2008 - 8:36amI can't find it anymore, so maybe it's been removed, but some really stupid ignorant person put up a comment about "pigs" on this page the other day, and after thinking about it I wanted to comment on it.
I am not close friends with anyone in the house that was raided, but I do know several of them well enough to say that none of them would use that kind of language. They're all up-standing, intelligent people who have been working on improving their house, gardening in the community, and sharing food with folks who are needy.
The police are now trying to claim (see the Philadelphia Inquirer, from today) that the house had graffiti in it that said "Kill the Pigs". This is complete nonesense. Whoever got on this website and made the comment related to "pigs" is either a) a really stupid person who none of us want around our movement or b) a police mole intended to plant the idea that these folks are part of a hate group.
It's nonesense, and it's got to stop.
Get informed!!! Don't Talk to Cops
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 06/18/2008 - 6:45pmWatch these 2 videos. They're a lecture given by a criminal defense lawyer and a cop. Watch both. Now. Your ignorance of your rights damages everyone's freedom (or what's left of it).
Don't Talk to Cops, Part 1
http://youtube.com/watch?v=i8z7NC5sgik
Don't Talk to Cops, Part 2
http://youtube.com/watch?v=08fZQWjDVKE&feature=related
two new daily news articles
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 06/20/2008 - 8:40amtwo new daily news articles on this:
http://www.philly.com/dailynews/local/20080620_Jill_Porter__Whatever_the...
and
http://www.philly.com/dailynews/local/20080620_Dave_Davies__To_get_L_I_o...
Thanks
Submitted by edinburgh accommodation (not verified) on Mon, 09/29/2008 - 1:43pmI believe that it is about time that the FEDS put the pressure on those who infringe or violate the ideas of another organization or person. Like it was stated earlier this week that last year alone $500,000,000,000 dollars was stolen from industries from such violators of the law. I just can't wait until the FEDS turn the heat up on copyright violators of the law.
Nice One
Submitted by edinburgh accommodation (not verified) on Mon, 09/29/2008 - 11:07pmThanks for sharing with us such an informative article.Last year, for example, the King County Sheriff's Office alone seized various items from 155 people, according to state records. Of those cases, 44 people requested hearings to contest the seizures.
But fewer than half ever actually had their hearings, estimated Keith Scully, a deputy prosecutor assigned to the sheriff's office. Some claimants settled their cases before the hearing, he said, and many more simply didn't show up.
ok
Submitted by Bodybuilding store reviews (not verified) on Mon, 11/10/2008 - 3:36pmThe honey moon brought on by the election of the new mayor and his appointees will be over soon. The police are acting like they did in the Rizzo era. God help us all
The police are now trying to
Submitted by current gas prices (not verified) on Mon, 11/10/2008 - 3:41pmThe police are now trying to claim that the house had graffiti in it that said "Kill the Pigs". Has anyone confirmed if this is true or not?
What kind of BS is this..the
Submitted by cheap florida vacations (not verified) on Fri, 11/14/2008 - 3:16pmWhat kind of BS is this..the cops are out of control all across country. I know because i live in LA.
Bottom line..Police SUCK!!
Submitted by Dump Trailers (not verified) on Thu, 11/20/2008 - 4:47pmBottom line..Police SUCK!!
Post new comment