Submitted by jon peppers (not verified) on Sat, 12/05/2009 - 12:42pm
their home was foreclosed there are, in my opinion,two people responsible. One is the fast buck lender and the other who bought a home they couldn't afford with a ARM mtg. To 'DEMAND" housing is not responsible. If those who's personal priorities (TV's cell phones, video games etc)were grater than shelter for their families, then to "demand" housing is irresponsible and to "demand" the "City"(taxpayers) provide same is, in my opinion, even more irresponsible.
If
Submitted by jon peppers (not verified) on Sat, 12/05/2009 - 12:42pmtheir home was foreclosed there are, in my opinion,two people responsible. One is the fast buck lender and the other who bought a home they couldn't afford with a ARM mtg. To 'DEMAND" housing is not responsible. If those who's personal priorities (TV's cell phones, video games etc)were grater than shelter for their families, then to "demand" housing is irresponsible and to "demand" the "City"(taxpayers) provide same is, in my opinion, even more irresponsible.
jon pisano