Editoral Policy |
Webeditorial
-
-
-
-
Iran's Historic Anniversary
Stephen Lendman,
Feb 12, 4:09 am
-
-
-
NATO's Secret War on Syria
Stephen Lendman,
Feb 11, 4:31 am
(1 )
-
America's Sham Economic Recovery
Stephen Lendman,
Feb 11, 3:55 am
-
-
-
-
Murdering Khadar Adnan
Stephen Lendman,
Feb 10, 3:34 am
-
-
-
Act Up Against ACTA
Stephen Lendman,
Feb 9, 4:10 am
-
-
Gaza: Isolated Under Siege
Stephen Lendman,
Feb 9, 3:46 am
-
-
PERSONAL INTEGRITY BY L. RON HUBBARD
consuelo palacios,
Feb 8, 8:50 pm
(1 )
-
HUMAN RIGHTS INTERNATIONAL LAW.
Consuelo Palacios,
Feb 8, 2:59 pm
(1 )
Newswire Archive Hidden
|
|
It is indeed a problem
Submitted by Rich Gardner on Fri, 11/06/2009 - 6:01pmthat Wilder's religious bigotry is described as racism. Don't think that describing relgious bigotry as an ideology is any more accurate, though.
Wilders is defending "diversity"? Interesting definition of diversity, seeing as he's defending European culture against Muslim culture. Again, we're dealing with highly inaccurate definitions.
Erm, the people who wiped out large numbers of American and Australian natives were not "immigrants" in the sense that Muslims are immigrants to Europe. The people currently known as Americans and Australians made no attempt to become part of the native societies that were there first. Natives were simply pushed aside. When a Muslim migrates to, say, France, he or she must undergo some measure of assimilation, he or she must accept French rules and laws to at least some degree.
The problem of poorer people outbreeding more affluent people is a worldwide one, with Mexicans becoming dominant in the areas that were Mexican before 1846.
Please read Wilders' comments again before you claim that Muslims defending Muslim lands and Wilders' bigoted statements have anything in common.