The lack of sufficient or CONSISTENT evidence means that the trial should have been thrown out to begin with. A confession by someone else (which was thrown out) years AFTER he was already found guilty should have lead to his release from prison. So, Mr. Pisano, I think perhaps you should go take a another look at the evidence of innocence or lack of evidence of guilt before you make such confident statements.

The fact is, Philadelphia used to be the home to and still is the home to some of the most corrupt law enforcement officials and representatives. If you're not the right race and/or class, you don't benefit from those perks in the corrupt judicial system.

I understand that Faulkner may not have deserved to die but lets not let an innocent man continue to be a victim of circumstance. I thought the point of justice was to serve it to the RIGHT people or the GUILTY people. We should no longer let an innocent man sit on death row for a crime he didn't committ. Maybe all of the "Justice for Officer Daniel Faulkner Crowd" should try conducting their own investigation of the truth instead of wasting time spreading "he deserves to die" propaganda. Read between the lines and find your own truth. REAL JUSTICE will never let you down.