Editoral Policy |
Webeditorial
-
-
Has-been
Patrice Faubert,
May 24, 12:18 pm
-
Sentencing at Yolo County Ca
Graciela Rodriguez ,
May 24, 9:32 am
-
-
Time Profiles a World Class Thug
Stephen Lendman,
May 24, 3:27 am
-
Illicit Drug Trade:A Shared Problem.
Paola Martinez,
May 24, 2:23 am
(1 )
-
-
-
-
-
-
Killing with Impunity
Stephen Lendman,
May 23, 3:34 am
-
-
-
-
Battleground Chicago
Stephen Lendman,
May 22, 4:02 am
(1 )
-
Pushing for War on Iran
Stephen Lendman,
May 22, 3:33 am
(1 )
-
-
Chicago Under Siege
Stephen Lendman,
May 21, 3:52 am
-
Jerusalem Day
Stephen Lendman,
May 21, 3:26 am
Newswire Archive Hidden
|
|
Are you trying to suggest
Submitted by Rich Gardner on Tue, 02/10/2009 - 1:17amthat 527s are the ONLY means by which wealthy contributors can influence politics? Seems to me that Verizon gave lots nd lots of money to the Democratic convention last year and hey wow! Surprise! Surprise! Democrats soft-pedaled the idea of punishing telephone companies for warrantless wiretapping! Amazing how that happens!
Obama's campaign depended much less on wealthy contributors than McCain's campaign did, but yeah, about 2/3rds to 3/4ths of his campaign cash came from people making contributions of $250 or more.
I'm aware that the combined campaigns of both sides got up to around a billion dollars this last year. If you think that Democrats are the only ones benefiting from rich peoples' contributions, you're living in a fantasyland.