While you may feel that opposition to stop and frisk unfounded and misguided, you cannot say that part of the policy includes confiscating the homes and possessions of those who oppose.

The issue here is not the targeted enforcement against illegal guns in "hot spots", but the attacks on law-abiding citizens and their right to speak their minds with their neighbors without fear of the government or any other entity stealing their homes and property.

A cogent debate on stop & frisk is warranted, and should probably be brought up as a separate article in the newswire. Nevertheless, one cannot defend the arrests of these 4 from their homes based on the validity of Nutter & Ramsey's experimental gun policing policy.