Mr. Di Zio's standard of proof is low enough that I wouldn't trust him to adjudicate a playground quarrel between my kids. If someone had killed my husband I would want to know who did it, or, if that were impossible, I'd want to weigh all the evidence and come to some reasonable conclusion. The evidence in this case seems to me to point to someone else to the extent that it points anywhere; it's so complicated that it takes about 20 minutes just to lay it all out. Mr. Di Zio's soundbyte doesn't convince.