Examining Judy Wood's appeal to a psy-ops victim and his dubious science to explain her own 9-11 theories. The fact that these born again patriots of America did not create effective political movements of a thousand bleeding cuts to derail “imperial mobilization” while the monumental crimes against humanity were and still are very much in progress, and instead kept insisting on a “new investigation”, speaks volumes. To get the public engaged in such criminal absurdities of endless debates as per Ezra Pound's Technique of Infamy, is the core success of those WHO planned 9/11. They covered up their fantabulistic crime in its aftermath, and effectively prevented any derailing of its harvesting, with such sophisticated finesse that it will remain the standard benchmark of psychological operations for all intelligence agencies for generations to come!

Therefore, for those attempting to study 9/11, it is primarily a forensic case for a Sherlock Holmes and a Hercule Poirot who can draw on expert opinions as pertinent and set aside other expert opinions as false, rather than some some simplistic noble minded (and Nobel minded) scientists and self-ascribed scholars of truth assuming that the only thing false about 9/11 was the false-flag operation of demolishing the towers, but everything else is straightforward including the “evidence”. Nothing is straightforward. A criminal mind that can plan and execute the 9/11 as 'Operation Canned Goods' for creating the pretext for “imperial mobilization” is certainly also diabolically smart enough to realize that it also would require cover stories and the subsequent spins, including leaving a trail of enticing red herrings right at the crime scene. If an overzealous detective picks up one or more of these red herrings as if they are real clues, and creates his erudite analysis on this “evidence”, you know where he ends up – in the woods! No pun intended.