home

Blaming al Qaeda more doesn't mean more war

by

Al Qaeda is preventing the closing of Guantanamo. Guantanamo will unlikely be closed without the American people facing up to the fact that al Qaeda is doing what it can to prevent a major asset for their propaganda from being closed down.

(PS Some will say this blog is ridiculous because there are no al Qaeda troops in Afghanistan, however there are al Qaeda suicide bombers.)

On Inauguration Day President Obama announced that he was planning to close Guantanamo within a year. On that same day bin Laden made a video that al Qaeda of Yemen, then new group, was merging with al Qaeda of Saudi Arabia and the new head would be Jamal al Badiwi. Al Badiwi one of those convicted of bombing the US Cole. The US turned him over to Yemen custody which he escaped for a while. Later he and other al Qaeda members in an amnesty process each in their own words condemned the idea that Islam believed in attacking the innocent and he was free again,
www.economist.com/node/13041120

As a supposed head of an al Qaeda he never did anything. But think of the fallout on the Obama administration if someone like him had been released by Obama from Guantanamo and was pressured, perhaps under knife point, to claim to be al Qaeda’s new leader.

The US talks of Afghanistan policy between one election and the next. But bin Laden talks of the over a thousand-year war between Islam and the West, and claims that Islam stopped being the leader of the world because the idea of a permanent war fell out of favor. And that Muslim culture will continue to be picked on as inferior unless Islam becomes a permanent warring state. The CIA ‘s own annalists admit that bin Laden’s videotape chiding Bush for reading “the Little Goat” instead of attending to business was an attempt to get Bush re-elected.

Bin Laden’s mind isn’t on nukes or chemicals but on bankrupting the US. Even the amateurs who sent the package bomb that didn’t explode or those who sent the underpants bomber bragged on how much the US spent in response compared to what they spent.

France also has been countering al Qaeda An al Qaeda faction also happens the be involved in North East Africa especially in Mali, where the US hasn’t been involved since 2006. France is handling things there. Al Qaeda has had some very successful kidnapings for ransom. But France attacked instead of paying ransom. Bin Laden video threatened the Eiffel Tower, and general mayhem on France a country that is almost 5% Islam. Goggle France declares war against al Qaeda, and vice versa to get a lot of details. As far as baiting France into bankruptcy, France’s defense budget steadily declines.

I could make armchair suggestions that Obama announce that we are getting out even if al Qaeda suicide-bombs US withdrawing troops. But the main thing is to realize that Al Qaeda plans to win and will be very disappointed if all the deaths of Muslims al Qaeda caused would be in vain. I wonder what would happen if Obama announced that his al Qaeda policy would be whatever France might suggest it should be.

Sufi Muslims are being slaughtered in Pakistan. The Sufi belief that Islam has something to do with love infuriates al Qaeda.
www.twocircles.net/2010jul03/indian_sufi_sunnis_condemn_lahore_blasts_ta...

Imam Abdul Rauf a Sufi who wants a cultural center which will include a mosque, near the 9/11 attack, went to the US government to offer his help in stopping al Qaeda and calls al Qaeda a “cult of death” rather unSufi-like. Some so-called US patriots condemn him for not likewise condemning Hamas, which would also be un-Sufi like. In the meantime many Americans ask why US Muslims don’t speak out more against al Qaeda while showing anything but appreciation for a Muslim who is systematically doing so.

In the end it is more than possible that al Qaeda will win, and the US will be no more. I actually don’t believe this because I think we will wise up instead, but as to this belief I have of yet no evidence to back it up.

RichardKanePA.blogspot.com
by Richard Kane

Comments

Correction: 1/23/09 al Qaeda video has Al Badawi, not as the lea

Problem with Post:

The January 23, 2009 al Qaeda video has Al Badawi, not as the leader but one of the four people forming al Qaeda of the Arabian Peninsula. Therefore either there was a January 22 pre-announcement video, or else non-Arabic speaking websites, keeping track of terror, saw the pictures and recognized some Arabic words but no longer post the early conclusions.

A careful site is the following, but it hedges “not fully translated”,
www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2010/10/31/ignoring_yemen_at_our_peril
"Months later, in January 2009, two former Guantánamo Bay detainees, both of whom the U.S. had released, showed up in a video sitting beside al-Wihayshi and al-Raymi and together they announced the formation of a new regional organization, al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP). Almost immediately, the newly merged group went after the man at the top of its hit list, Muhammad bin Nayyif, Saudi Arabia's deputy minister of the interior and the single biggest threat to its continued existence"

.

According to Yemen, al-Badawi is back in jail, though some on the Internet sites doubt it, http://wwaw.almotamar.net/en/3661.htm

As to my contention that al Qaeda could push former Guantanamo detainees toward embarrassing the Obama administration if they got released. Note al Qaeda tried to manipulate the US before then: The CIA’s own analysts, when bin Laden harassed President Bush about “The Little Goat”, CIA analysts concluded that Bin Laden was trying to get Bush reelected. If anyone remembers during Abu Ghraib, additional photos came out that Congress privately viewed. Then Republican Majority Leader Bill Frist held a press conference to report on the pictures and call for bipartisan detention reform. He was cut off the air by a news bulletin of Nick Berg’s beheading being posted to the Internet.

Al Qaeda will continue to manipulate the US in the direction of bankruptcy if the American people and our government representatives let them.

.

Hint sometimes I noticed if I can't click a link I can google it then scrawl down to the same link that had clicked unavailable, and I'll get it.

http://readersupportednews.org/pm-section/21-21/4585-blaming-al-qaeda-mo...

RichardKanePA
RichardKanePA.blogspot.com

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options